凡自治之物 · LGD 治理学 · 创造术家族 | 评测协议:skill-quality-gate
English
⚠️ AI-assisted tool, decision reference only — not professional/legal advice, not a compliance certificate. Human review required; official authorities decide. Text self-check: 2026-09-26 · clause text per latest official publication.
I. Pain point
Regulation is written across scattered documents; self-checking is costly and error-prone. This tool turns hard rules into an enumerable classifier.
II. Boundaries
- Rule determination only, no legal advice; conclusions need human review.
- Rule sources: 《无人驾驶航空器飞行管理暂行条例》(State Council Order 761, effective 2024-01-01) articles 6/12/16/31/32 + CCAR-92 (clause numbers pending human check; always per latest official text).
- Strict presumption on insufficient input: with one weight given, concludes the heaviest-obligation plausible grade and warns the possible range (rc=1) — never silently outputs a lenient grade.
- Out of scope: airspace attributes, operator qualifications, insurance, cross-border/commercial review.
III. Usage
python uas-ops-checker.py --mtow 5 # only MTOW → strict presumption, rc=1
python uas-ops-checker.py --mtow 5 --empty_weight 4 # complete → light, rc=0
python uas-ops-checker.py --demo # built-in smoke (3 cases)
Args: mtow (max takeoff weight kg) / empty_weight (empty weight kg); at least one.
IV. Real output (demo case 2 excerpt)
{
"tool": "uas-ops-checker",
"input": {"mtow": "5"},
"result": {
"grade": "小型 (small)",
"grade_basis": "strict presumption (incomplete input)",
"possible_grades": ["micro", "light", "small"],
"obligations": ["pilot license (per model)", "real-name registration", "mandatory liability insurance", "flight outside suitable airspace needs application"],
"evidence": ["Interim Reg. art.6", "Interim Reg. art.16", "CCAR-92"],
"warnings": ["incomplete input; category uses both MTOW and empty weight", "uncertain grade range micro~small; presumed heavy end"]
},
"rc": 1
}
Three cases: mtow=0.2 → micro; mtow=5 → small (strict presumption); mtow=120 → medium; all rc=1.
V. Exit codes
| rc | Meaning | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | done, no warnings | complete params, micro/light grade |
| 1 | done with warnings | incomplete input (strict presumption) or small/medium/large |
| 2 | input insufficient/invalid | no args, non-numeric, empty > mtow, non-positive |
VI. FAQ
- Q: Is this a compliance certificate? A: No, decision support only.
- Q: Only one weight? A: strict presumption, rc=1.
- Q: Rules outdated? A: per latest official text;
clause_review_checklistmaps each clause to its use. - Q: Is identification reporting / flight upload "evidence"? A: No — per LGD semantics, evidence = verifiable basis of governance state transitions, not behavior logs.
Theory
Every autonomous thing must first be registered, evidenced, gated — drone classification is the birth registration of air governance.
中文
⚠️ 本工具由 AI 辅助生成,仅供决策参考,不构成专业/法律意见,也不构成任何合规证明。输出请人工复核,并以主管部门认定为准。 文本核验日期:2026-09-26 · 条款文本以官方最新发布为准。
何时用
- 当用户需要无人机运营合规分类判定器相关能力时。
- 触发词:合规、判定器、TH-UAS-001、uas-ops-checker。
一、痛点
监管规则白纸黑字但散落多份文件,企业/个人自查成本高、易因错判触雷。本工具把硬规则变成可枚举的判定器。
二、能力边界
- 仅做规则判定,不做法律意见;结论须人工复核。
- 规则源:
《无人驾驶航空器飞行管理暂行条例》(国务院令761号,2024-01-01施行) 第6/12/16/31/32条 + CCAR-92(条款号待人工核对)。 - 输入不足时从严推定:只给一个重量参数时,取「可能等级中义务最重者」作为结论,并在
warnings中明示(rc=1)。 - 不覆盖:空域属性、运营主体资质、保险安排、涉外与商业运营的额外审查项。
三、用法
python uas-ops-checker.py --mtow 5
python uas-ops-checker.py --mtow 5 --empty_weight 4
python uas-ops-checker.py --demo
参数:mtow(最大起飞重量 kg)/ empty_weight(空机重量 kg);至少给一个。
流程
- 触发:识别无人机运营合规分类判定器相关任务(见「何时用」)。
- 执行:按「用法」运行uas-ops-checker.py。
- 校验:核对脚本输出/退出码是否符合预期。
- 交付:向用户呈现结果/产物。
证据与安全声明
- 证据:TBD(暂无评测/徽章链接;产生后在此更新实际链接)
- 版本:1.0.1
- 安全:未做独立安全扫描(TBD),结论待补;补全前不作推荐背书。
