360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Claude Email Skill

核心功能为基于Claude的邮件提示词生成、活动草稿撰写、评审循环、重写优化等,遵循规范工作流确保内容符合需求、合规且可审核。典型场景包括AI代理处理邮件规划、起草、QA、交接等环节,如生成提示包、评估草稿、制定评审规则。输入为邮件相关需求,输出含Claude提示词、邮件草稿、评审标准等,执行需明确批准,区分建议与操作。

polnikale
polnikale
热度 21.64
最近更新 2026-06-17 21:18:47
分类:营销依赖:内部调用大模型应用场景:文案创作 / 邮件起草 / 工作流 / 校对润色

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add claudeemailskill
Metadata
name
claudeemailskill
description
Use when Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cowork, or another AI agent needs to plan, review, implement, audit, or improve email work focused on Claude-oriented email prompts, campaign drafting, critique loops, and human review. Triggers include requests about prompt packs, campaign draft evaluation, review rubrics, rewrite loops, and Claude Code email handoffs.

Claude Email Skill

Use Claude for structured reasoning and critique, but keep the message accountable to the brief, audience, and approval owner.

Decision Lens

  • Primary lens: Claude-oriented email prompts, campaign drafting, critique loops, and human review.
  • Common request signals: prompt packs, campaign draft evaluation, review rubrics, rewrite loops, and Claude Code email handoffs.
  • Default posture: Use Claude for structured reasoning and critique, but keep the message accountable to the brief, audience, and approval owner.
  • Useful output family: Claude prompts, campaign drafts, critique rubrics, rewrite instructions, variant sets, and approval-ready copy packets.
  • Production boundary: separate recommendation from execution.

When To Use

Use this skill for Claude-oriented email prompts, campaign drafting, critique loops, and human review. It is designed for agent workflows where email work must be specific, reviewable, and safe across planning, drafting, implementation, QA, or operational handoff.

Operating Workflow

  1. Turn the request into a clear email brief with audience, promise, proof, CTA, tone, constraints, and forbidden claims.
  2. Choose the Claude task shape: ideation, first draft, critique, rewrite, variant generation, or final QA.
  3. Provide Claude with bounded source material and ask it to cite which input drove each major claim.
  4. Review outputs against a rubric instead of taste alone: relevance, specificity, risk, readability, and production readiness.
  5. For rewrites, preserve approved facts and change only the requested dimension such as tone, length, structure, or CTA emphasis.
  6. Mark anything that needs human approval, legal review, data validation, or ESP testing.

Review Criteria

  • The prompt gives Claude enough context without exposing unnecessary private data.
  • Drafts do not invent guarantees, customer proof, pricing, or compliance claims.
  • Critique feedback is actionable and tied to the brief.
  • Variants test a meaningful hypothesis rather than superficial wording.
  • Final copy includes subject, preview, body, CTA, and QA notes when relevant.

Output Pattern

Return Claude prompts, campaign drafts, critique rubrics, rewrite instructions, variant sets, and approval-ready copy packets. Keep recommendations concrete. Separate analysis from live-system actions, and require explicit approval before sending email, importing contacts, changing DNS, altering suppression rules, or editing production automations.