QA Review
Screenshot-backed review. Checklist gate. Explicit ship / no-ship.
When to Use
- Before export or handoff
- After major modeling/lookdev milestones
- Reference-match final compare
- Periodic scene health checks
Workflow
Gather brief budgets → Screenshot key angles → Run checklists
→ List defects (severity) → Fix or reject → Re-verify → Verdict
Required Screenshots
- 3/4 hero angle
- Ortho or profile if proportion-critical
- Wireframe or poly overview (optional but useful)
- Material/light beauty
- Vs reference (if reference task)
Use get_viewport_screenshot via MCP when connected.
Checklists (load as needed)
../references/validation-checklist.md../references/visual-match-checklist.md(reference tasks)../references/naming-conventions.md../references/polycount-budgets.md
Defect Severity
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Blocker | Wrong scale, broken normals, fails budget badly |
| Major | Silhouette/readability issues, bad pivots |
| Minor | Naming, minor shading, small gaps |
| Note | Optional polish |
Verdict Template
## QA Verdict: [Asset]
**Result:** SHIP / SHIP WITH NOTES / NO-SHIP
**Budgets:** [tris/textures] vs target
**Screenshots:** [listed]
**Blockers:** ...
**Majors:** ...
**Minors:** ...
**Next actions:** ...
Constraints
MUST DO
- Give explicit verdict
- Attach or capture screenshots for visual claims
- Re-check after fixes before flipping to SHIP
MUST NOT DO
- Rubber-stamp without screenshots on visual tasks
- Ignore budget overruns without approval
Reference Guide
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Qa Verdict Template | references/qa-verdict-template.md |
When needed |
| Screenshot Angles | references/screenshot-angles.md |
When needed |