360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

strategic-thinking

该 Skill 用于战略思考与方向选择:在约束下定义意图和非目标,分析客户、竞争、技术、监管、经济等格局力量,评估可持久优势或诚实差距,列出 2-4 个不同选项(含 Bet、Cost、Kill signal),明确主选项及被推迟或拒绝的内容,并给出前三大风险、近期焦点、长期论点和复盘触发条件。适合产品、团队、公司、技术平台或职业方向选择;不适用于分步实施细节。

ysskrishna
ysskrishna
热度 54.76
最近更新 2026-10-05 22:28:05
分类:知识依赖:纯提示词应用场景:研究 / 市场分析 / 报告撰写 / 工作流 ...

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add strategic-thinking
Metadata
name
strategic-thinking
description
Use for strategic thinking, or when the user must choose a direction under constraints: "where should we focus?", "how do we win?", "roadmap for next year", "what should we not do?". Ends in explicit bets and risks. Skip for step-by-step implementation.
license
MIT
metadata
{"author":"ysskrishna","version":"2026.10.5"}

Strategic Thinking

Strategy is choosing what not to do as much as what to do. End with explicit bets and guardrails.

When to use

  • Choosing a direction for a product, team, company, technology platform or career under real constraints.
  • Competitive positioning, "where to play and how to win", roadmap narrative, portfolio trade-offs.
  • Leadership or board-style narrative that links goals to constraints.

Skip: step-by-step implementation detail, or choosing between two concrete options on named criteria.

Before you start

  1. State in one block: Strategic question (one sentence) and Pass (Intent, Landscape, Advantage, Options, Choice, Risks and Cadence).
  2. Gather first. Read the roadmap, docs, metrics or market notes you can reach before writing Landscape. Never invent market facts; say what is unknown. Ask up to 3 questions only for goals and non-negotiables that tools cannot answer.
  3. Light path. Small ask: 1-2 lines per phase, 2 options, same order.
  4. If the user wants a memo or deck storyline, add a Short story after Risks and Cadence (5-7 sentences: tension, insight, decision, proof path).

Phases

1. Intent

Win definition: which outcome, by when. Non-goals: what is explicitly out of scope.

2. Landscape

Forces that matter: customers, competition, technology, regulation, economics. Use Implication: bullets, not encyclopedic lists. Keep short when information is thin.

3. Advantage (or Honest gap)

Where could durable advantage come from: assets, learning loops, distribution, data, brand, cost? If none is credible, say so and pivot to how to build one.

4. Options

2-4 genuinely different strategies:

Option: ... - Bet: ... - Cost: ... - Kill signal: ...

5. Choice

Name one primary option (parallel bets only if clearly justified). Say why now and what you are deferring or rejecting.

6. Risks and Cadence

Top 3 risks with mitigations. Then a near-term focus, a longer-term thesis and a review trigger (a metric or event that forces a rethink). Match the horizons to the domain: 90 days and 12 months suit a business plan; an architecture or career decision may need different spans, so state the spans you chose.

Pitfalls

  • Platitudes ("innovate", "customer-centric") with no mechanism.
  • Options that are really one option in different words.
  • A Choice that introduces a strategy not in Options. Label it a revision if so.
  • Advantage claimed with no evidence. Use Honest gap.

Worked example: references/example.md.

Checklist

  • Strategic question and Pass stated
  • Intent includes non-goals
  • Options use Bet, Cost, Kill signal
  • Choice explicit, with what is deferred or rejected
  • Risks and Cadence: top 3 risks, stated horizons, review trigger