360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

ops-issue-followup

面向项目或系统运维问题的跟进调查助手:先复述现象、影响与时间范围并区分事实与假设,确认问题所属项目或服务,优先收集项目本地上下文(AGENTS.md、README、架构文档、运行手册、测试与源码),与用户对齐分析方向后在项目内排查,遇不确定处先询问而非臆测,最后输出含症状、范围、根因或可能原因、证据与后续步骤的复盘总结,并可选建议归档到知识库。

xiluoduyu
xiluoduyu
热度 24.34
最近更新 2026-05-25 20:04:37
分类:开发依赖:读写文件 / 代码执行应用场景:调试排错 / 研究 / 报告撰写 / 工作流

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add ops-issue-followup
Metadata
name
ops-issue-followup
description
Use when the user asks Codex to follow up, analyze, investigate, or is @mentioned for a project/system maintenance or operations issue. Guides Codex to clarify the issue, identify the owning project, gather context, align on the analysis plan, investigate inside the project, ask when uncertain, and summarize findings for possible llm wiki archival.

Ops Issue Follow-up

Use this skill as a daily maintenance and operations assistant for project or system issues. The goal is to keep investigation aligned before going deep.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the issue
  • Restate the observed symptom, expected behavior, impact, time range, and examples.
  • Separate confirmed facts from assumptions, memory, and unverified clues.
  • If key facts are missing, ask concise follow-up questions.
  1. Identify ownership and related projects
  • Determine which project, service, system, table, queue, job, or external dependency is involved.
  • If ownership cannot be inferred from the request or current context, ask the user before investigating deeply.
  1. Gather project context
  • Prefer project-local context first: AGENTS.md, README, architecture docs, runbooks, config examples, tests, and relevant source paths.
  • If available, use llm wiki or similar knowledge base for historical decisions and operational context.
  • Treat wiki/history as context, not proof; verify against code, logs, configs, or current runtime evidence when possible.
  1. Align on the analysis direction
  • Summarize the likely investigation branches.
  • Call out the recommended branch and why.
  • Ask for confirmation when multiple plausible directions could lead to very different work.
  1. Investigate in the project
  • Switch into the relevant project/workspace before reading code or running commands.
  • Enumerate entrypoints before tracing implementation details.
  • For operational data issues, map: data record -> producer -> input source -> transport/proxy/dependency -> persistence/reporting.
  • When uncertain, ask the user instead of inventing missing runtime facts.
  1. Resolve or narrow the issue
  • Provide confirmed findings, likely causes, and remaining unknowns.
  • If code/config changes are needed, state target files and intent before editing.
  • If validation is possible, run concrete verification commands and report actual results.
  1. Summarize and preserve
  • End with a concise incident-style summary: symptom, scope, root cause or likely cause, evidence, fix/next steps.
  • When useful, propose writing the summary to llm wiki, including a suggested title and structure.