360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Unit Test Coverage Helper

该 Skill 提供一套通用工作流:先复述目标、约束与成功标准,再给出实现步骤和测试验证命令,仅在关键信息缺失时追问,最后产出答案、可复用清单与验证说明,帮助团队为现有代码库补充单元测试、提升覆盖率。材料中未内置脚本、测试框架或覆盖率工具。

kyro-ma
kyro-ma
热度 13.95
最近更新 2026-07-13 20:46:56
分类:开发依赖:内部调用大模型应用场景:代码生成 / 工作流 / 模板

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add unit-test-coverage-helper-005353
Metadata
name
unit-test-coverage-helper
description
Help users with Validated demand: Teams need repeatable help adding useful unit tests and raising test coverage for existing codebases. This requirement is supported by 12 separate online signals across 3 source families, so it represents broader demand rather than a single isolated request.. Use when a user asks for software-and-data, unit tests, test coverage, testing, regression, or needs a practical workflow, artifact, checklist, analysis, or implementation support for this requirement.

Unit Test Coverage Helper

Requirement

Use this skill to help software maintainers, QA engineers, open-source contributors, and product teams who need confidence that changes do not break existing behavior with:

Validated demand: Teams need repeatable help adding useful unit tests and raising test coverage for existing codebases. This requirement is supported by 12 separate online signals across 3 source families, so it represents broader demand rather than a single isolated request.

Demand score: 100/100 (70/70 demand, 30/30 local feasibility). Evidence: 12 signals across 3 source families.

Read references/requirement-plan.md when source evidence, planning details, or review criteria are needed.

Workflow

  1. Restate the user's outcome, constraints, available inputs, and success criteria.
  2. Inspect technical constraints, propose implementation steps, and include test or verification commands when code or data is involved.
  3. Ask only for missing information that materially changes the output; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue.
  4. Keep the implementation local-hardware friendly: prefer scripts, templates, checklists, and small-model or CPU-safe workflows over cloud-only or large-training approaches.
  5. Produce the requested artifact, workflow, checklist, analysis, code change, or decision support.
  6. Validate the output against the success criteria and list any remaining risks or follow-up work.

Expected Outputs

  • A tailored answer or artifact for the user's immediate situation.
  • A reusable checklist or workflow when the task is repeatable.
  • A verification note showing how the result was checked.

Validation

  • The output directly addresses the discovered requirement.
  • The user can act on the result without reading the original source post.
  • Assumptions, limits, and required inputs are visible.
  • The final response includes a short usage or next-step note when helpful.

Triggers

Keywords: software-and-data, unit tests, test coverage, testing, regression, quality

Example trigger sentences:

  • Help me Teams need repeatable help adding useful unit tests and raising test coverage for existing codebases.
  • I need a practical workflow for Teams need repeatable help adding useful unit tests and raising test coverage for existing codebases.
  • Use $unit-test-coverage-helper to handle Teams need repeatable help adding useful unit tests and raising test coverage for existing codebases.