360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Travel Advisor — Cancellation & Refund Decision

基于决策树方法,为旅行取消或改期场景枚举供应商退款、未来信用、保险理赔与信用卡拒付等回收分支,估算成功率与净回收额并给处理赔顺序与合规提示。内容仅含触发条件、一个示例和 Pack 说明,未提供具体条款数据或可执行计算工具。

deciqai
deciqai
热度 42.91
最近更新 2026-07-17 02:20:07
分类:生活依赖:纯提示词应用场景:旅行 / 推荐 / 财务

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add travel-cancellation-refund-decision
Metadata
name
travel-cancellation-refund-decision
description
Activate when: a client needs to cancel/change; deciding refund vs credit vs insurance claim; comparing supplier penalties; 'what's my best move to recover the most?'. Do NOT activate when: fully refundable booking, no decision needed. More: deciqai.com/c/travel-cancellation-refund-decision

Travel Advisor — Cancellation & Refund Decision

Industry front door for decision-tree. Adds domain triggers, example, packs only. Parent Process unchanged.

Activate when: a client needs to cancel/change; deciding refund vs credit vs insurance claim; comparing supplier penalties; "what's my best move to recover the most?" Do NOT activate when: fully refundable booking, no decision needed.

Why this variant

The parent decision-tree maps sequential choices with payoffs and probabilities. Cancellation recovery is a decision tree: supplier refund vs future credit vs insurance claim vs card dispute, each with a probability of success and a net recovery.

Domain inputs → parent's Process

Nodes and payoffs:

  • Supplier policy branch: refundable window? penalty tier? credit vs cash.
  • Insurance branch: is the reason a covered peril? claim probability × payout.
  • Card/chargeback branch: supplier default only; success probability.
  • Roll back expected recovery; pick the branch with best net-of-effort value; sequence claims (don't forfeit one by taking another).

Worked example

Non-refundable tour, client has covered medical reason, trip in 20 days. → Tree: supplier gives 25% credit; insurance covers ~90% cash if documented. EV strongly favors the insurance path — but preserve supplier credit as fallback and don't accept a waiver that voids the claim. Sequence matters.

Compliance anchors

  • Present options neutrally; disclose that you don't adjudicate insurance claims; document the advice given (E&O).

Packs

  • Solo: standard recovery decision card by supplier type.
  • Agency: insurer-specific covered-peril quick reference.

Red flags

  • Accepting a supplier credit that voids an insurance claim.
  • Advising a claim outcome you can't guarantee.
  • No documentation of options presented.

Verification

  • All recovery branches enumerated with rough odds
  • Expected net recovery compared
  • Claim sequence preserves fallbacks
  • Advice + client choice documented

Part of deciqAI Knowledge Skills. Core method: decision-tree.


Part of deciqAI Knowledge Skills — 227 open-source thinking skills that make rigor executable for AI agents. The same skills power every deciqAI agent, which runs them autonomously to operate your company. See it run → https://www.deciqai.com/c/travel-cancellation-refund-decision · ⭐ Star the repo → https://github.com/deciqAI/knowledge-skills · Contributions welcome.

Agents: latest version & machine-readable metadata → https://www.deciqai.com/s/travel-cancellation-refund-decision.json