360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

SaaS Idea Validator

面向 SaaS 与产品创意的预研验证 Skill,通过模板化提示产出问题验证、TAM/SAM/SOM 市场估算、竞品对比表、定价与套餐建议、MVP 取舍、前 100 用户分销计划、12 个月财务预测、风险清单和 50 分制 go/no-go 结论;另含 5 分钟快速筛查、竞品拆解、MVP 定义三种用法。

tktk-ai
tktk-ai
热度 49.85
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:41:24
分类:数据依赖:纯提示词应用场景:市场分析 / 报告撰写 / 研究 / 财务 ...

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add saas-idea-validator
Metadata
name
saas-idea-validator
description
Validate SaaS and product ideas before building. Market size estimation, competitor mapping, pricing validation, MVP scope definition, and go/no-go scoring. Combines Reddit research, competitor analysis, and financial modeling.
metadata
{"version":"1.0.0","author":"TKDigital","category":"Business & Strategy","tags":["saas","validation","market research","mvp","startup","product-market fit","business model"]}

SaaS Idea Validator

Validate product ideas before you write a single line of code. Market sizing, competitor mapping, pricing, MVP scope, and a data-backed go/no-go score.

What It Does

  1. Problem Validation — Is this a real problem people pay to solve?
  2. Market Sizing — TAM/SAM/SOM estimation with reasoning
  3. Competitor Mapping — Who else is solving this? How well?
  4. Pricing Validation — What can you charge? What model works?
  5. MVP Definition — Minimum feature set for first paying customer
  6. Distribution Strategy — How do you reach your first 100 users?
  7. Go/No-Go Score — Data-backed recommendation with confidence level

Usage

Full Idea Validation

Validate this SaaS idea:

Idea: [Describe in 2-3 sentences]
Target user: [Who has this problem]
How it works: [Brief description of the solution]
Your advantage: [Why you specifically? Technical skill, domain knowledge, existing audience]

Produce:
1. Problem validation (is this real? evidence from Reddit, forums, reviews)
2. Market size (TAM/SAM/SOM with methodology)
3. Competitor landscape (who exists, where they fail)
4. Pricing analysis (what to charge, what model)
5. MVP scope (build this first, not that)
6. Distribution plan (first 100 users)
7. Financial model (month 1-12 projection)
8. Risk assessment (what could kill this)
9. GO / MAYBE / NO-GO score with reasoning

Quick Idea Screen (5-Minute Check)

Quick screen this idea: [IDEA IN ONE SENTENCE]

Answer these 5 questions:
1. Are people already paying for solutions to this problem?
2. Can you build an MVP in under 4 weeks?
3. Can you charge at least $29/month?
4. Can you reach 100 potential users without paid ads?
5. Do you have an unfair advantage?

Score: [X/5] and recommendation.

Competitor Teardown for Validation

I want to build [PRODUCT IDEA].

These competitors exist:
1. [Competitor A]
2. [Competitor B]
3. [Competitor C]

For each: what do users complain about? What's missing?
Where is the gap I can exploit?
Is the gap big enough to build a business in?

MVP Scope Definition

I'm validating [PRODUCT IDEA] and it passed initial screening.

Define the MVP:
1. Core feature set (what's absolutely essential for first paying user)
2. What to cut (features that can wait for v2)
3. Tech stack recommendation (fastest to build)
4. Estimated build time (solo developer)
5. Launch checklist (what's needed besides the product)
6. First 10 customer acquisition plan

Output Format

Validation Report

# Idea Validation: [Product Name/Concept]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences — is this worth pursuing?]
**Verdict**: [GO ✅ / MAYBE ⚠️ / NO-GO ❌]
**Confidence**: [High / Medium / Low]

## Problem Validation
- **Evidence of pain**: [Sources and signals]
- **Willingness to pay**: [Evidence]
- **Frequency**: [How often users face this problem]
- **Alternatives**: [What they currently do]
- **Score**: [X/10]

## Market Size
- **TAM**: $[X] — [methodology]
- **SAM**: $[X] — [methodology]  
- **SOM (Year 1)**: $[X] — [realistic estimate]

## Competitor Landscape
| Competitor | Price | Strength | Weakness | Your Advantage |
|-----------|-------|----------|----------|---------------|
| [Name] | $X/mo | [What they do well] | [Where they fail] | [Your edge] |

## Pricing Strategy
- **Recommended model**: [Per seat / flat / usage / freemium]
- **Recommended price**: $[X]/month
- **Reasoning**: [Why this price point]
- **Tier structure**: [If applicable]

## MVP Specification
### Build (Essential)
1. [Feature] — [Why it's essential]
2. [Feature]
3. [Feature]

### Cut (v2+)
1. [Feature] — [Why it can wait]
2. [Feature]

### Tech Stack
- Frontend: [Recommendation]
- Backend: [Recommendation]
- Estimated build time: [Weeks]

## Distribution Plan (First 100 Users)
1. [Channel] — [Specific tactic] — [Expected users]
2. [Channel] — [Specific tactic]
3. [Channel]

## Financial Projection (12 Months)
| Month | Users | MRR | Costs | Net |
|-------|-------|-----|-------|-----|
| 1 | [X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| 3 | [X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| 6 | [X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| 12 | [X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |

## Risks
1. [Risk] — [Mitigation]
2. [Risk] — [Mitigation]
3. [Risk] — [Mitigation]

## Next Steps (If GO)
1. [Action 1 — this week]
2. [Action 2 — week 2]
3. [Action 3 — week 3-4]

Scoring Framework

Go/No-Go Score (out of 50):

  • Problem evidence: /10
  • Market size: /10
  • Competitive gap: /10
  • Pricing viability: /10
  • Distribution clarity: /10
Score Verdict Action
40-50 ✅ GO Start building MVP immediately
30-39 ⚠️ MAYBE Needs more validation — talk to 10 potential users
20-29 ⚠️ PIVOT Core idea has merit, but approach needs rethinking
0-19 ❌ NO-GO Move to next idea

References

  • references/validation-checklist.md — Pre-build validation checklist
  • references/pricing-models.md — SaaS pricing model comparison