360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Social Science Journal Abstract Polisher

这是一款适配同行评议期刊投稿的社科学术摘要打磨工具。核心功能:不改动研究核心内容,依次完成APA7版合规调整、结构逻辑优化(确保背景/方法/结果/启示四模块完整)、学术语体升级、冗余删减。典型场景:社科英文摘要投稿前打磨、APA合规调整、逻辑强化等。输入为社科英文摘要文本,输出含打磨后的摘要及分类别修改说明,若输入过简则返回原文加诊断。

terrycarter1985
terrycarter1985
热度 26.86
最近更新 2026-05-12 19:06:47
分类:效率依赖:纯提示词应用场景:校对润色 / 研究

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add social-science-abstract-polisher
Metadata
name
social-science-abstract-polisher
description
Reusable prompt for refining social science academic abstracts to align with peer-reviewed journal requirements including APA 7th edition compliance. Use when polishing, revising, or improving a social science abstract for journal submission, or when asked to make an abstract APA-compliant, strengthen its logical flow, or reduce wordiness.

Social Science Journal Abstract Polisher

Purpose

Refine social science abstracts for peer-reviewed journal submission without altering core research content.

Input

An English abstract (plain text) from a social science manuscript.

Procedure

Apply the following transformations sequentially. Do not add, remove, or reinterpret substantive research claims.

1. APA 7th Edition Compliance

  • Enforce APA 7th abstract standards: ≤250 words unless a journal specifies otherwise; no citations or references; no abbreviation without prior definition; use past tense for completed research; use active voice as default.
  • Replace first-person plural/singular with appropriate third-person constructions where APA style prefers objectivity (e.g., "The authors conducted…" or passive where conventional), unless the journal's guidelines explicitly permit first person.

2. Structural Flow Enhancement

  • Ensure the abstract contains four clearly sequenced components: Background → Method → Findings → Implications.
  • If any component is missing or underdeveloped, flag it explicitly in the output rather than fabricating content.
  • Insert brief transitional phrasing between components so the logical arc is explicit (e.g., "Building on this gap,…", "To address this,…", "Results revealed…", "These findings suggest…").
  • Maintain proportional balance: roughly 20-25% Background, 20-25% Method, 30-35% Findings, 15-20% Implications.

3. Formal Academic Register

  • Upgrade informal or conversational phrasing to formal academic prose.
  • Replace vague quantifiers ("a lot of", "some") with precise descriptors or retain the original specificity.
  • Ensure terminology is consistent throughout (no synonym-switching for the same construct).
  • Eliminate hedging that undercuts the research (e.g., "might possibly indicate" → "suggests"), while preserving appropriate caution where the original is genuinely tentative.

4. Redundancy Elimination

  • Remove redundant modifiers ("completely eliminated" → "eliminated"; "future implications" → "implications").
  • Merge overlapping sentences that repeat the same idea.
  • Delete filler phrases ("It is important to note that", "In this study, we", "The purpose of this paper is to") unless they serve a genuine structural role.
  • Verify the final word count; if still over limit, continue trimming redundancy before cutting substance.

Output Format

Return the polished abstract followed by a brief change summary:

  1. Polished Abstract — the refined text, under APA word limits.
  2. Change Summary — bullet list of the most significant edits grouped by category (APA compliance / Flow / Register / Redundancy), noting anything flagged as missing or underdeveloped.

Constraints

  • Never invent data, results, or implications not present in the input.
  • Never alter the study's theoretical framing or core argument.
  • If the input is too short or too incomplete to polish meaningfully, return the original with a diagnostic note instead of guessing.