360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Service Qa Coach

该 Skill 依据用户提供的客服渠道、质量目标、问题记录与团队背景,输出 Markdown 格式的 QA 辅导简报,包含评分表、失效模式分析、辅导计划、校准与抽样指引及假设与限制。它不接入实时工单、通话录音、CRM 或 QA 平台,也不虚构坐席绩效事实。

harrylabsj
harrylabsj
热度 33.55
最近更新 2026-06-06 05:10:46
分类:数据依赖:内部调用大模型应用场景:报告撰写 / 模板 / 任务管理

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add service-qa-coach
Metadata
name
service-qa-coach
description
Review support quality for chat, email, phone, social DM, or marketplace service teams. Use when a team needs a QA scorecard, failure-mode analysis, coaching plan, calibration checklist, or service-improvement brief without live ticketing, CRM, or contact-center system access.

Service QA Coach

Overview

Use this skill to turn support quality concerns into a structured QA and coaching brief. It helps define the scorecard, isolate likely failure modes, recommend coaching actions, and organize a sampling and calibration rhythm.

This MVP is heuristic. It does not connect to live ticketing systems, call recordings, chat exports, CRMs, or QA platforms. It relies on the user's provided support notes, issue patterns, and service expectations.

Trigger

Use this skill when the user wants to:

  • audit customer service quality across chat, email, phone, social DM, or marketplace tickets
  • build or refine a QA rubric for support teams
  • diagnose recurring service failures such as poor empathy, policy errors, or weak resolution quality
  • create a coaching plan for agents, team leads, or new hires
  • run a calibration sprint before changing SOPs or scorecards

Example prompts

  • "Help me build a QA scorecard for our live chat team"
  • "Why are refund escalations rising in customer service?"
  • "Create a coaching plan for agents with low empathy and policy accuracy"
  • "Turn these support issues into a QA and calibration brief"

Workflow

  1. Capture the support channel, review mode, and quality concern.
  2. Choose the focus areas such as compliance, empathy, resolution, speed, or documentation.
  3. Identify the likely failure modes and coaching priorities.
  4. Define sampling, calibration, and follow-up rhythm.
  5. Return a markdown QA coaching brief.

Inputs

The user can provide any mix of:

  • support channel such as chat, email, phone, social DM, or marketplace tickets
  • quality goals such as CSAT recovery, policy compliance, or escalation reduction
  • issue notes such as slow responses, low empathy, incorrect policy answers, or poor note-taking
  • team context such as new hires, macro usage, QA backlog, or uneven supervisor coaching
  • sample size, review cadence, and escalation process assumptions

Outputs

Return a markdown QA coaching brief with:

  • QA summary
  • scorecard rubric
  • failure mode review
  • coaching plan
  • calibration and sampling guidance
  • assumptions and limits

Safety

  • Do not claim access to live tickets, recordings, or customer records.
  • Do not invent agent-level performance facts that were not supplied.
  • Privacy, compliance, refund, and disciplinary decisions remain human-approved.
  • Reduce certainty when the sample is tiny or anecdotal.

Best-fit Scenarios

  • service teams that need a lighter QA framework before investing in tooling
  • ecommerce operators managing outsourced or mixed support teams
  • managers trying to reduce escalations, refunds, or poor customer sentiment

Not Ideal For

  • live contact-center monitoring or real-time QA enforcement
  • regulated complaint handling that requires legal or compliance review
  • detailed workforce management or call-center forecasting

Acceptance Criteria

  • Return markdown text.
  • Include rubric, coaching, calibration, and limits sections.
  • Keep the no-live-data framing explicit.
  • Make the output practical for team leads and support managers.