360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Sc-RNA Cell Type Annotator

该 Skill 通过打包脚本 scripts/main.py,依据各聚类的差异表达标记基因、组织类型与物种,输出细胞类型预测、标记基因支持、置信度和备选建议。依赖 Python 3.10+ 与 pandas,本地读取输入并写出结果,不调用外部 API;输入缺失或超出范围时按文档停止并请求最小必要信息。

aipoch-ai
aipoch-ai
热度 41.80
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:38:37
分类:数据依赖:代码执行 / 读写文件应用场景:数据处理 / 研究

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add scrna-cell-type-annotator
Metadata
name
scrna-cell-type-annotator
description
Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes.
license
MIT
skill-author
AIPOCH

ScRNA Cell Type Annotator

Single-cell cluster identification.

When to Use

  • Use this skill when the task needs Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes.
  • Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
  • Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

See ## Prerequisites above for related details.

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • pandas: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.

Example Usage

cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/scrna-cell-type-annotator"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/main.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/main.py.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py

Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
  2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
  3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
  4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
  5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

Use Cases

  • Post-clustering annotation
  • Novel cell type discovery
  • Cross-study comparison
  • Atlas construction

Parameters

  • cluster_markers: DEG per cluster
  • tissue_type: Organ context
  • species: Human/mouse

Returns

  • Cell type predictions
  • Marker gene support
  • Confidence levels
  • Alternative suggestions

Example

Cluster 1: IL2RA, CD3D → CD4 T cells

Risk Assessment

Risk Indicator Assessment Level
Code Execution Python/R scripts executed locally Medium
Network Access No external API calls Low
File System Access Read input files, write output files Medium
Instruction Tampering Standard prompt guidelines Low
Data Exposure Output files saved to workspace Low

Security Checklist

  • No hardcoded credentials or API keys
  • No unauthorized file system access (../)
  • Output does not expose sensitive information
  • Prompt injection protections in place
  • Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
  • Output directory restricted to workspace
  • Script execution in sandboxed environment
  • Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
  • Dependencies audited

Prerequisites


# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt

Evaluation Criteria

Success Metrics

  • Successfully executes main functionality
  • Output meets quality standards
  • Handles edge cases gracefully
  • Performance is acceptable

Test Cases

  1. Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
  2. Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
  3. Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

Lifecycle Status

  • Current Stage: Draft
  • Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
  • Known Issues: None
  • Planned Improvements:
    • Performance optimization
    • Additional feature support

Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

  • Objective or requested deliverable
  • Inputs used and assumptions introduced
  • Workflow or decision path
  • Core result, recommendation, or artifact
  • Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
  • Unresolved items and next-step checks

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of scrna-cell-type-annotator and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

scrna-cell-type-annotator only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

  1. Objective
  2. Inputs Received
  3. Assumptions
  4. Workflow
  5. Deliverable
  6. Risks and Limits
  7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.