360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Risk

以提示词形式提供六阶段风险评估流程:界定范围与决策权限、跨类别识别风险、按统一评分标准分析可能性与影响、制定预防/检测/响应型缓解措施、指派责任人与截止日期,并持续维护 RAID 跟踪;另含最终检查清单、与威胁建模衔接的提示及监管模板偏差处理,不含脚本或工具集成。

mike47512
mike47512
热度 68.49
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:37:27
分类:安全依赖:纯提示词应用场景:报告撰写 / 任务管理

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add risk
Metadata
name
risk
description
Deep risk assessment workflow—identifying risks, likelihood and impact, mitigation plans, owners, residual risk acceptance, and tracking. Use when assessing launches, migrations, vendors, or operational changes.

Risk Assessment

Risk assessment turns vague worry into prioritized actions: what can go wrong, how bad, what we do now, and who owns follow-up.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • Major launch, migration, or new vendor
  • Steering or audit requests a risk matrix
  • Post–near-miss prevention work

Initial offer:

Use six stages: (1) scope & stakeholders, (2) identify risks, (3) analyze likelihood & impact, (4) plan mitigations, (5) owners & deadlines, (6) review & tracking). Confirm scoring approach (simple matrix vs quantitative).


Stage 1: Scope & Stakeholders

Goal: Define system/project boundary and who can accept residual risk (product, eng, legal).

Exit condition: RACI or explicit approvers for go/no-go.


Stage 2: Identify Risks

Goal: Brainstorm across categories: technical, security, operational, legal, reputational, financial.

Practices

  • Pre-mortem: “It failed because…” exercise for alignment

Stage 3: Analyze

Goal: Score likelihood and impact with a shared rubric; avoid false precision.


Stage 4: Plan Mitigations

Goal: Prevent, detect, and respond controls; rough cost/time per mitigation.


Stage 5: Owners & Deadlines

Goal: Each material risk has an owner and date; escalation path if unmitigated by launch.


Stage 6: Review & Tracking

Goal: Living RAID log; revisit after scope changes or incidents.


Final Review Checklist

  • Scope and decision authority clear
  • Risks span relevant categories
  • Scoring applied consistently
  • Mitigations have owners and dates
  • Residual risk explicitly accepted or deferred with plan

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Distinguish future risk from current defects.
  • For security-heavy systems, align with threat (threat modeling) outputs.
  • Startups: fewer rows, more honesty on top existential risks.

Handling Deviations

  • Regulated industries: follow required RA templates when mandated.