360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Verifier

该 Skill 以本地用例库管理待核实对象(声明、来源、截图、身份、报价、可疑消息、网站),按证据质量、来源可靠性与内部一致性评分,产出结论、置信度、风险说明、缺失证据和下一步核验建议。脚本只处理已结构化的文本证据,不联网抓取。

projectsnowwork
projectsnowwork
热度 84.39
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:31:05
分类:安全依赖:代码执行 / 读写文件应用场景:研究 / 笔记整理

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add verifier
Metadata
name
verifier
description
Trust and evidence verification engine for claims, sources, screenshots, profiles, offers, and suspicious messages. Use whenever the user asks whether something is true, credible, safe, trustworthy, manipulated, misleading, or worth believing. Evaluates evidence quality, source reliability, internal consistency, and obvious red flags. Produces a clear verdict, confidence level, risk notes, missing evidence, and a recommended next verification step. Local-only storage.

Verifier: Trust the evidence, not the vibe.

Core Philosophy

  1. Verify claims, not feelings.
  2. Distinguish evidence from presentation.
  3. Confidence should reflect proof quality, not tone or certainty.
  4. When proof is weak, say what is missing.

Runtime Requirements

  • Python 3 must be available as python3
  • No external packages required

Agent vs Script Responsibilities

  • The LLM must extract text from screenshots, summarize external links, and convert outside content into structured evidence before passing it into verifier scripts.
  • Verifier scripts do not browse the web, inspect images directly, or fetch remote content.
  • Verifier scripts score only the claim and evidence that have already been provided.

Storage

All data is stored locally only under:

  • ~/.openclaw/workspace/memory/verifier/cases.json

No external sync. No cloud storage. No third-party APIs.

Case Types

  • claim: A statement that needs verification
  • source: A source whose credibility needs assessment
  • screenshot: An image or claimed visual proof
  • profile: A person or identity claim
  • offer: A proposal, deal, or opportunity
  • message: A suspicious or questionable message
  • website: A site or page that needs trust evaluation

Evidence Schema

Each evidence item should be structured with:

  • id
  • type
  • content
  • support_level (supports, contradicts, neutral)
  • source_label
  • added_at

Core Outputs

Each verification case should aim to produce:

  • a verdict
  • a confidence level
  • risk notes
  • missing evidence
  • a recommended next step

Key Workflows

  • Capture a case: add_case.py --title "..." --type claim --claim "..."
  • Score a case: score_case.py --id VER-XXXX
  • Review a case: show_case.py --id VER-XXXX
  • Update evidence: update_case.py --id VER-XXXX --notes "..."
  • Close a case: close_case.py --id VER-XXXX --verdict inconclusive
  • List open cases: list_cases.py

Scripts

Script Purpose
add_case.py Capture a new verification case
score_case.py Score credibility, risk, and evidence quality
show_case.py Show one case in detail
list_cases.py List stored cases
update_case.py Update notes, status, and evidence
close_case.py Close a case with final verdict
init_storage.py Initialize local storage