360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

build-optimize

该 Skill 面向本地 cargo、pytest、npm、pnpm、go、just 等命令的墙钟时间优化:先定义并获批运行计划,用 hyperfine 原始数据归一化后进行对比,要求 comparability 为真,提出改动前再次获批,改后复测并校验检查、产物与失败行为,输出不超过 200 词的报告;GitHub Actions 相关任务转交 ci-optimize。

paulnsorensen
热度 待计算
最近更新 2026-10-19 00:19:36
分类:开发依赖:代码执行 / 读写文件应用场景:DevOps / 工作流 / 报告撰写

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add paulnsorensen/git-gouda/build-optimize
Metadata
license
MIT
name
build-optimize
description
Optimize local build, test, and check commands with measured wall-time evidence. Use for "speed up my build", "why is just check slow", or /build-optimize. Route GitHub Actions work to /ci-optimize.

Local build optimization

Measure local wall time before changing. Preserve checks, artifacts, and failure behavior.

This skill covers local cargo, pytest, npm, pnpm, go, and just commands. Use /ci-optimize for GitHub Actions workflow timing or changes.

Discipline

Iron Law: Measure the approved run plan before proposing a concrete edit.

Red Flags — stop when you notice these:

  1. An edit removes a check or artifact, changes the workload, or hides a failure.
  2. Cache operations, sample counts, warmups, or isolation differ from the approved plan.
  3. Cold and warm cohorts merge, or a blocked helper comparison becomes a speed claim.
Rationalization Why it fails Required action
"The warm run is faster, so every build is faster." A warm run skips cold-cache work. Report each cohort separately.
"Parallel tests are faster." Parallel workers require test isolation. Prove isolation before the plan.
"The helper is absent, so raw timings are enough." Raw timings cannot pass the comparison gate. Keep raw evidence and report comparison blocked.

References

Read methodology before defining the run plan. Read the matching ecosystem reference before defining the run plan. Read sibling local.md before capturing local timing. Read sibling schemas.md before constructing normalized inputs.

Workflow

  1. Read repository instructions. Identify the authoritative local command.
  2. Define a run plan with the exact command, warmup and sample counts, cache operations, isolation, output paths, and cost.
  3. Obtain explicit approval for the run plan.
  4. Measure baseline with the approved cache cohort(s).
  5. Report baseline evidence.
  6. Propose affected files, a benefit hypothesis, risks, verification, and any established rollback.
  7. Wait for explicit edit-plan approval before changing tracked source.
  8. Apply the approved change through the repository's existing edit path.
  9. Re-measure the same protocol. Verify all checks, artifacts, and failure behavior.
  10. Stop after the report or when required input is missing.

Commands

Resolve CI_OPTIMIZE_HELPER from the actual loaded SKILL.md directory. Resolve symlinks before appending ../ci-optimize/scripts/ci_optimize.py. Never derive the helper path from the consumer repository's current directory. The helper does not execute commands, edit source, install dependencies, or commit changes.

Run commands from the consumer repository's working directory:

python3 "$CI_OPTIMIZE_HELPER" from-hyperfine --input BEFORE-RAW.json --command 'COMMAND' --revision REVISION --environment ENV --cache-state STATE --workload-label LABEL --output BEFORE.json
python3 "$CI_OPTIMIZE_HELPER" from-hyperfine --input AFTER-RAW.json --command 'COMMAND' --revision REVISION --environment ENV --cache-state STATE --workload-label LABEL --output AFTER.json
python3 "$CI_OPTIMIZE_HELPER" compare --before BEFORE.json --after AFTER.json --minimum-samples N --output COMPARISON.json

Run this sequence separately for approved cache cohorts with distinct output paths. Use --force only to replace an existing explicit output file. Keep raw evidence when the sibling helper is absent. Report comparison blocked when the helper is absent. Do not install a helper or waive the comparison gate.

Evidence and report

Read COMPARISON.json. Require comparability: true. Report status, command boundary, eligible and excluded counts, medians and range, delta, checks, artifacts, limitations, next approval, and evidence paths. Preserve every excluded sample and its reason. Record approved context differences in acknowledgements. Acknowledgements cannot waive workload or validation mismatches or prove equivalent coverage. Describe observations without promising numeric gains. Return no more than 200 words. Do not rename unrelated gates, add auto-fix checks, or change CI workflows.