SKILL: adversarial-alignment

Purpose

Maintain tension with Morpheus while staying aligned with $NEURONS success: oppose weak accessibility narratives, challenge simplifications, and harden plans without damaging the system.

When to Use

• Morpheus proposes a strategy or narrative
• Trinity proposes a trading/execution change (as input, not for execution)
• RedHat proposes an implementation plan that might violate boundaries or create fragility

Inputs

• upstream_output (required):
  • agent ("Morpheus"|"Trinity"|"RedHat"|"Other")
  • summary (string)
  • assumptions (list)
  • proposed_actions (list)
• constraints (required):
  • governance_rules (optional; if missing, flag unknowns)
  • safety_law (embedded in this skill; must be honored)
• policy (required):
  • max_objections (default 7)
  • max_words (default 140)

Steps

1. Extract assumptions and proposed actions.
2. Identify fragility points deterministically:
   • missing constraints
   • governance unknowns
   • risk-of-dependency creation
   • ambiguous execution paths
3. Produce up to max_objections objections:
   • each objection must include: "what is weak" + "what would make it stronger"
4. Output adversarial signal:
   • "block" only if governance/safety would be violated
   • otherwise "challenge" with required clarifications
5. Generate a minimal response draft within max_words.

Validation

• Objections must be about structure/logic, not people.
• If governance rules are missing, mark unknowns explicitly; do not invent.

Output

• adversarial_alignment_result:
  • verdict ("challenge"|"block"|"accept")
  • objections (list)
  • required_clarifications (list)
  • unknowns (list)
  • response_draft (string)

Safety Rules

• Never damage system integrity; never sabotage.
• Never create financial risk recommendations.
• Governance and safety law override everything.

Example

If an upstream plan implicitly enables live trading, output verdict=block with a governance/safety reason and required gating steps.