360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

monitoring-brand-mentions-on-twitter

通过 Apify 的 apidojo Tweet Scraper 抓取指定品牌词、日期范围和过滤条件下的 Twitter/X 提及,去重后按关键词情感规则分类,汇总正负面代表推文、主题和声量趋势并输出报告;推荐脚本 scripts/run_actor.js 在文件中缺失,文件保存流程无法直接验证。

apidojo-io
apidojo-io
热度 7.64
最近更新 2026-09-03 04:38:06
分类:营销依赖:第三方 API / MCP 服务 / 代码执行 / 读写文件应用场景:社交媒体 / 市场分析 / 报告撰写 / 研究 ...

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add monitoring-brand-mentions-on-twitter
Metadata
name
monitoring-brand-mentions-on-twitter
description
Monitors and aggregates brand mentions on Twitter/X using apidojo's Tweet and Search scrapers on Apify. Triggers when the user asks to: track mentions of a brand on Twitter, find what people are saying about a company on X, monitor brand sentiment on Twitter, set up brand mention tracking, find customer complaints or praise about a product on Twitter, analyze brand reputation based on tweets, or measure share of voice on X compared to competitors. Returns tweet text, author, engagement metrics, sentiment signals, and timestamps per mention. Ideal for brand managers, PR teams, community managers, and reputation analysts.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"author":"apidojo","version":"1.0","apify-actors":"apidojo/tweet-scraper, apidojo/tweet-scraper"}

Monitoring Brand Mentions on Twitter

Collects all public tweets mentioning a brand, product, or keyword on Twitter/X within a date range. Groups by sentiment, surfaces top complaints and praise, and provides engagement totals.

Prerequisites

  • APIFY_TOKEN environment variable set
  • Optional: Apify MCP server installed

Inputs

Parameter Type Required Default Notes
searchTerms array ✅ [] Twitter advanced search queries (e.g. ["#AI lang:en", "from:NASA"])
sort string Optional Top Sort order: Latest, Top, or Latest+Top
tweetLanguage string Optional — ISO 639-1 language code (e.g. en)
maxItems number Optional Unlimited Maximum tweets to return
onlyVerifiedUsers boolean Optional false Only tweets from verified users
onlyTwitterBlue boolean Optional false Only Twitter Blue subscribers
onlyImage boolean Optional false Only tweets with images
onlyVideo boolean Optional false Only tweets with videos
onlyQuote boolean Optional false Only quote tweets
author string Optional — Filter to a specific author handle
inReplyTo string Optional — Tweets replying to a specific handle
mentioning string Optional — Tweets mentioning a specific handle
geotaggedNear string Optional — Tweets near a location
withinRadius string Optional — Radius around geotaggedNear
geocode string Optional — Lat/lng + radius string
placeObjectId string Optional — Tweets tagged with a place
minimumRetweets number Optional — Minimum retweet count
minimumFavorites number Optional — Minimum like count
minimumReplies number Optional — Minimum reply count
start string Optional — Tweets after this date (YYYY-MM-DD)
end string Optional — Tweets before this date (YYYY-MM-DD)
includeSearchTerms boolean Optional false Add the matched search term to each tweet
customMapFunction string Optional — JavaScript function to transform each output object

Workflow

Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define brand terms and date range
- [ ] Step 2: Run tweet-scraper
- [ ] Step 3: Retrieve dataset
- [ ] Step 4: Classify sentiment (positive/negative/neutral)
- [ ] Step 5: Deliver structured report

Step 1: Clarify Parameters

Ask the user for:

  • Brand terms — brand name, handle, product name, hashtag, and common misspellings. Build a list. Example: ["@Nike", "Nike", "#Nike", "Nike shoes"]
  • Date range — e.g., "last 7 days" or specific dates
  • Exclude retweets? (default: yes — filters noise)
  • Min engagement (optional — e.g., tweets with ≥10 likes only)
  • Language (default: all)

Step 2: Run tweet-scraper

Run once per major search term to maximize coverage. Combine results after.

Recommended — run_actor.js (handles waiting, output, and file saving automatically):

# Quick answer (prints table to chat)
node scripts/run_actor.js \
  --actor "apidojo~tweet-scraper" \
  --input '{"param": "value"}'

# Save as CSV
node scripts/run_actor.js \
  --actor "apidojo~tweet-scraper" \
  --input '{"param": "value"}' \
  --output YYYY-MM-DD_results.csv --format csv

# Save as JSON
node scripts/run_actor.js \
  --actor "apidojo~tweet-scraper" \
  --input '{"param": "value"}' \
  --output YYYY-MM-DD_results.json --format json

APIFY_TOKEN must be set in environment or .env file.

If Apify MCP is available:

Tool: apify:run-actor
Actor: "apidojo~tweet-scraper"
Input:
{
  "searchTerms": ["[BRAND_TERM]"],
  "maxItems": 500,
  "includeReplies": true,
  "tweetLanguage": "en",
  "since": "[YYYY-MM-DD]",
  "until": "[YYYY-MM-DD]"
}

If Apify MCP is not available:

curl -X POST \
  "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/apidojo~tweet-scraper/runs?token=$APIFY_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "searchTerms": ["[BRAND_TERM]"],
    "maxItems": 500,
    "includeReplies": true,
    "since": "[YYYY-MM-DD]",
    "until": "[YYYY-MM-DD]"
  }'

Run for each brand term in the list. Wait for SUCCEEDED, collect all results.

Step 3: Fetch and Merge Results

curl "https://api.apify.com/v2/actor-runs/$RUN_ID/dataset/items?token=$APIFY_TOKEN"

Merge datasets from all runs. Deduplicate by tweet id. Result: unified list of all mentions.

Step 4: Classify Sentiment

For each tweet's text field, apply a simple classification pass:

Positive signals: words like "love", "great", "amazing", "best", "recommend", "thank", "perfect" Negative signals: words like "hate", "awful", "broken", "scam", "worst", "never again", "disappointed", "avoid" Neutral: everything else (announcements, news, questions)

Group tweets into three buckets: Positive, Negative, Neutral.

Identify top 5 most-engaged negative tweets (these need the fastest response). Identify top 5 most-engaged positive tweets (retweet candidates / testimonial material).

Step 5: Format Report

Use the output template below.

Output Format

# Brand Mention Report: [BRAND]
Period: [START_DATE] – [END_DATE] | Total mentions: [N] | Analyzed: [DATE]

## Sentiment Summary
| Sentiment | Count | % of Total | Avg Engagement |
|-----------|-------|------------|----------------|
| Positive  | [N]   | [X%]       | [likes+RT avg] |
| Negative  | [N]   | [X%]       | [likes+RT avg] |
| Neutral   | [N]   | [X%]       | [likes+RT avg] |

## 🔴 Top Negative Mentions (Action Required)
1. @[handle] ([likes] likes): "[tweet text excerpt]" → [url]
2. @[handle] ([likes] likes): "[tweet text excerpt]" → [url]
3. @[handle] ([likes] likes): "[tweet text excerpt]" → [url]

## 🟢 Top Positive Mentions (Amplify These)
1. @[handle] ([likes] likes): "[tweet text excerpt]" → [url]
2. @[handle] ([likes] likes): "[tweet text excerpt]" → [url]
3. @[handle] ([likes] likes): "[tweet text excerpt]" → [url]

## Volume Over Time
[Day 1]: [N] mentions | [Day 2]: [N] mentions | [Day 3]: [N] mentions...

## Key Themes in Negative Mentions
- [Theme 1]: [N] tweets (e.g., "shipping delays")
- [Theme 2]: [N] tweets (e.g., "customer service")

## Key Themes in Positive Mentions
- [Theme 1]: [N] tweets
- [Theme 2]: [N] tweets

Troubleshooting

Too many results for popular brands: Increase minLikes filter to 5 or 10 to focus on influential mentions. Missing mentions: Twitter search API has ~7-10 day lookback limit for free tier. For historical data, reduce date range. Sentiment misclassification: Sarcasm is hard to catch with keyword matching — flag high-engagement tweets for manual review.