360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

ccf-literature-monitor

面向科研选题与论文跟踪,扫描近期 arXiv、OpenReview、会议/论文集、实验室及竞品来源,按问题、方法、证据、基准等维度判断重叠,给出 RELAX/RESEARCH/FOLLOW-UP 信号和交接建议;强调日期范围、去重与证据边界,不把空扫描当作新颖性证明。

mikubaka88
热度 0.00
最近更新 2026-10-19 01:36:54
分类:搜索依赖:读写文件 / 第三方 API / 内部调用大模型应用场景:研究 / 报告撰写 / 摘要总结 / 工作流

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add mikubaka88/ccfa-skills/ccf-literature-monitor
Metadata
name
ccf-literature-monitor
description
Scan recent arXiv/OpenReview papers, venue feeds, labs, and competitors for overlap. Use for 竞品监控, 新论文追踪, 论文跟踪, and recurring novelty watch. Give dated evidence and changes since the prior scan. Broad related-work retrieval belongs to ccf-literature-searcher.
metadata
{"ccf_skill_controls":{"handoff_question_mode":"partial","respect_session_denylists":true,"protect_idea_scope_in_writing":true,"private_material_safety":"moderate","shared_controls":"../ccf-common/references/"}}

CCF Literature Monitor

Family File Contract

Before file work, reuse canonical paths and one task/artifact working directory; default to project-root ccfa-workfiles/<purpose>/<artifact-id>/. Update in place, preserve inputs, and use UTF-8 with Chinese-text checks. Apply artifact-contracts.md for naming, ownership, and task-created cleanup; handoffs inherit these paths.

Collaboration Contract

Before specialist execution, read and apply ccf-humanization first, then ccf-common. At every handoff, reuse their applicable active rules or refresh missing/changed ones. Both preflights are required even without prose; detailed editing, experiment, and maintenance modes run only when relevant.

Integrate necessary specialist contributions under one owner; reuse valid prerequisites and verify affected results. Follow the cooperation routes without duplicate reports.

Core Rule

Monitor arXiv, OpenReview, conference/proceedings feeds, project pages, labs, and named competitors for new papers that could overlap with the user's idea or paper. Report findings factually. Do not exaggerate novelty threats, dismiss real overlap, or infer priority from weak evidence. Provide actionable signals: RELAX, RESEARCH, FOLLOW-UP.

Modes

  • arxiv-watch: scan recent papers in target categories or keyword clusters.
  • venue-watch: scan OpenReview, proceedings, accepted-paper lists, or official venue pages.
  • novelty-check: compare a given idea with recent papers and flag overlap.
  • trend-scouting: summarize emerging directions, crowded areas, and under-tested gaps.
  • competitor-tracking: monitor named research groups, labs, repositories, datasets, benchmarks, or authors.
  • paper-alert-digest: produce a recurring watch report suitable for saving into a project folder.

Skill Linkage

  • @READS ccfa.yaml for idea state.
  • @SHARES findings with ccf-literature-searcher.
  • @SHARES novelty implications with ccf-idea-reviewer.
  • @SHARES rescue or differentiation opportunities with ccf-idea-optimizer.
  • @SHARES citation and positioning candidates with ccf-paper-writer.
  • @FLAGS conflicting papers for ccf-integrity-auditor.

Invocation Controls

CCFA Handoff Mode: PARTIAL (Recommended). Follow metadata.ccf_skill_controls.handoff_question_mode and ../ccf-common/references/handoff-modes.md.

Load ../ccf-common/references/task-modes.md before deciding exploratory, quick, or standard mode.

Treat unpublished ideas, draft abstracts, methods, and results as private material. Load ../ccf-common/references/privacy-and-evidence.md before using private text in queries. Use public-safe keywords, public method names, venue names, and user-approved query text.

Load ../ccf-common/references/review-output-standards.md when monitor results feed idea scoring, paper review, or score-risk language.

Workflow

  1. Load references/monitoring-workflow.md.
  2. If project state is available (ccfa.yaml), read the current idea, target venue, claims, and tracked competitors.
  3. Choose the mode and time window. If the user says "latest", "recent", "new", "this week", or "today", verify the current date and use an explicit date range.
  4. Execute the requested monitoring mode using public-safe queries and source-quality exclusions from the shared policy.
  5. Classify overlaps by problem, mechanism, evidence, benchmark, dataset, claim, and venue positioning.
  6. Report new or materially changed findings, with precise implications for the requested research decision. Use existing report history to avoid presenting the same paper as new. Reuse stable paper IDs and versioned source evidence from the existing topic report; fetch targeted metadata before full text. Check updates within the actual requested window even when older content is cached. Optional expansion into extra topics follows Common's extended_search preference and never replaces the required current scan.
  7. Execute already requested downstream work through its owner; otherwise offer optional handoff to ccf-literature-searcher for deep retrieval, ccf-idea-reviewer for score impact, ccf-idea-optimizer for differentiation, or ccf-paper-writer for related-work integration.

Output Contract

For each monitoring execution, report in this structure:

## Literature Monitoring Report: [Mode] - [Topic/Venue]

**As of:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Time range:** [from] to [to]
**Sources scanned:** [arXiv categories / venues / labs / APIs]
**Papers scanned:** [count]
**High-relevance papers:** [count]
**Overall signal:** RELAX / RESEARCH / FOLLOW-UP

| Title | Source | Overlap level | Overlap type | Evidence basis | Action |
|:---|:---|:---:|:---|:---|:---:|
| [title] | [arXiv/OpenReview/venue] | None/Low/Medium/High | Problem/Method/Evidence/Benchmark | [abstract/intro/result] | RELAX/RESEARCH/FOLLOW-UP |

**Actionable flags:**
- RELAX: no material overlap found in the scanned window; continue, but do not claim full novelty proof.
- RESEARCH: partial overlap or possible close work; deep retrieve via `ccf-literature-searcher`.
- FOLLOW-UP: significant overlap in problem, mechanism, and evidence; route to `ccf-idea-reviewer` or `ccf-idea-optimizer` before writing stronger novelty claims.

**Handoff signals:**
- `ccf-literature-searcher`: [papers or clusters to retrieve deeply]
- `ccf-idea-reviewer`: [novelty or score implications]
- `ccf-idea-optimizer`: [differentiation or rescue direction]
- `ccf-paper-writer`: [related-work or positioning update]
- `ccf-integrity-auditor`: [citation/attribution conflict]

**Output self-check:** [date range explicit, source basis stated, table valid, no unsupported novelty conclusion]

References

  • references/monitoring-workflow.md — Workflow, api-key-management, search strategy.
  • references/report-template.md — Output template and formatting.
  • ../ccf-common/references/source-registry.yaml — Competitor and arxiv links.

Execution And Persistence

Distinguish a single scan from recurring monitoring. A recurring report format is not a scheduler: claim ongoing monitoring only after an actual authorized scheduled job exists. Record the time window and coverage; an empty scan is not proof of novelty. Deduplicate by stable paper identity and version, separating first publication from revisions. Batch independent feeds when supported; preserve real monitoring history under ../ccf-common/references/artifact-contracts.md. Follow no-new-files and existing project-state authorization.