360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Risk

这是一套六阶段全流程风险评估工作流,核心功能涵盖定义评估范围与决策权限、多维度识别风险、用共享标准分析风险等级、制定缓解方案、明确责任人和跟踪机制,以及持续复盘更新。适用于重大项目发布、系统迁移、新供应商引入、审计要求或近失事件后的风险防控,可适配不同企业规模与合规要求,输出可落地的风险跟踪日志与决策依据。

mike47512
mike47512
热度 68.48
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:37:27
分类:安全依赖:纯提示词应用场景:法律文档 / 报告撰写 / 工作流

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add risk
Metadata
name
risk
description
Deep risk assessment workflow—identifying risks, likelihood and impact, mitigation plans, owners, residual risk acceptance, and tracking. Use when assessing launches, migrations, vendors, or operational changes.

Risk Assessment

Risk assessment turns vague worry into prioritized actions: what can go wrong, how bad, what we do now, and who owns follow-up.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • Major launch, migration, or new vendor
  • Steering or audit requests a risk matrix
  • Post–near-miss prevention work

Initial offer:

Use six stages: (1) scope & stakeholders, (2) identify risks, (3) analyze likelihood & impact, (4) plan mitigations, (5) owners & deadlines, (6) review & tracking). Confirm scoring approach (simple matrix vs quantitative).


Stage 1: Scope & Stakeholders

Goal: Define system/project boundary and who can accept residual risk (product, eng, legal).

Exit condition: RACI or explicit approvers for go/no-go.


Stage 2: Identify Risks

Goal: Brainstorm across categories: technical, security, operational, legal, reputational, financial.

Practices

  • Pre-mortem: “It failed because…” exercise for alignment

Stage 3: Analyze

Goal: Score likelihood and impact with a shared rubric; avoid false precision.


Stage 4: Plan Mitigations

Goal: Prevent, detect, and respond controls; rough cost/time per mitigation.


Stage 5: Owners & Deadlines

Goal: Each material risk has an owner and date; escalation path if unmitigated by launch.


Stage 6: Review & Tracking

Goal: Living RAID log; revisit after scope changes or incidents.


Final Review Checklist

  • Scope and decision authority clear
  • Risks span relevant categories
  • Scoring applied consistently
  • Mitigations have owners and dates
  • Residual risk explicitly accepted or deferred with plan

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Distinguish future risk from current defects.
  • For security-heavy systems, align with threat (threat modeling) outputs.
  • Startups: fewer rows, more honesty on top existential risks.

Handling Deviations

  • Regulated industries: follow required RA templates when mandated.