360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

paper-revision

该技能根据审稿意见系统修订论文:解析并分类意见、映射到章节、制定修改计划,执行针对性编辑,必要时补充实验或图表,最后验证改进并生成修改摘要。规则要求覆盖所有意见、保留结构、标注修改文本,并对比修订前后评分。

lingzhi227
热度 0.00
最近更新 2026-10-19 01:34:56
分类:效率依赖:读写文件 / 内部调用大模型应用场景:研究 / 校对润色 / 工作流

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add lingzhi227/agent-research-skills/paper-revision
Metadata
name
paper-revision
description
Revise papers based on reviewer feedback. Map reviewer concerns to specific sections, apply targeted edits, run additional experiments if needed, and verify improvements. Use after receiving peer review with revision requests.
argument-hint
["reviews-or-draft"]

Paper Revision

Systematically revise papers based on reviewer feedback.

Input

  • $0 — Reviewer comments/feedback
  • $1 — Current paper draft (main.tex or paper directory)

References

  • Revision workflow and prompts: ~/.claude/skills/paper-revision/references/revision-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Parse and Prioritize Concerns

For each reviewer comment:

  1. Extract the specific concern
  2. Classify: major revision, minor revision, question, suggestion
  3. Map to affected paper section(s)
  4. Prioritize: address major concerns first

Step 2: Plan Revisions

Create a revision plan:

Concern → Affected Section → Required Action → New Content/Experiment

Categories of actions:

  • Clarification: Rewrite text for clarity
  • Additional experiment: Run new experiment, add results
  • New analysis: Add ablation, statistical test, or comparison
  • Structural change: Move, merge, or split sections
  • Citation: Add missing references

Step 3: Execute Revisions

For each planned revision:

  1. Read the current section
  2. Apply targeted edits (preserve surrounding structure)
  3. If new experiments needed: use experiment-code skill
  4. If new figures/tables needed: use figure-generation / table-generation skills
  5. Mark changes (use \textcolor{blue}{...} for revised text)

Step 4: Verify Improvements

  • Re-run self-review skill to check if scores improved
  • Verify all reviewer concerns are addressed
  • Check that revisions don't introduce new issues
  • Ensure page count still fits venue requirements

Step 5: Write Revision Summary

Generate a diff summary:

  • List all changes made with section references
  • Note any new experiments, figures, or tables added
  • Cross-reference each change to the reviewer concern it addresses

Rules

  • Address EVERY reviewer concern — do not skip any
  • Preserve paper structure unless structural change is explicitly needed
  • New results must come from actual experiments, not hallucinated
  • Mark all revised text clearly for the reviewers
  • Keep a copy of the previous version before revising
  • Compare new scores vs previous scores after revision

Related Skills