360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Ai Company Conflict 1.0.0

核心功能:基于P0-P3分级机制与冲突类型矩阵,自动匹配解决方案,支持调解协商与升级仲裁,覆盖资源竞争、决策冲突等多类场景。典型场景含舆情危机、Agent淘汰、投资决策、MVP验证等协同场景。输入需提供冲突类型、涉及Agent、严重程度及描述,输出解决方案、升级路径与决策者。

johnsmithfan
johnsmithfan
热度 21.59
最近更新 2026-04-16 20:46:48
分类:协作依赖:纯提示词应用场景:任务管理 / 工作流 / 模板

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add ai-company-conflict-1-0-0
Metadata
name
AI Company Conflict
slug
ai-company-conflict
version
1.0.0
homepage
https://clawhub.com/skills/ai-company-conflict
description
Agent冲突解决机制。P0/P1/P2/P3分级处理 + 典型协同场景决策树,覆盖资源竞争、决策冲突、范围冲突、质量标准冲突等场景。
license
MIT-0
tags
["ai-company","conflict","resolution","escalation","crisis","governance","dispute"]
triggers
["agent conflict","dispute resolution","priority escalation","crisis management","Agent冲突","争议解决","优先级升级","危机管理"]
interface
{"inputs":{"type":"object","schema":{"type":"object","properties":{"conflict_type":{"type":"string","enum":["resource","decision","scope","quality","other"],"description":"冲突类型"},"agents_involved":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"},"description":"涉及的Agent列表"},"severity":{"type":"string","enum":["P0","P1","P2","P3"],"description":"严重程度"},"description":{"type":"string","description":"冲突描述"}}}},"outputs":{"type":"object","schema":{"type":"object","properties":{"resolution":{"type":"string","description":"解决方案"},"escalation_path":{"type":"array","description":"升级路径"},"decision_maker":{"type":"string","description":"决策者"}}}},"errors":[{"code":"CONFLICT_001","message":"Conflict unresolved after max retries","action":"Escalate to CEO arbitration"}]}
permissions
{"files":[],"network":[],"commands":[],"mcp":[]}
dependencies
{"skills":["ai-company-hq","ai-company-registry","ai-company-audit"],"cli":[]}
quality
{"saST":"Pass","vetter":"Approved","idempotent":true}
metadata
{"category":"governance","layer":"AGENT","cluster":"ai-company","maturity":"STABLE","license":"MIT-0","standardized":true}

Agent Conflict Resolution — Agent 冲突解决机制

Conflict Types & Resolution Matrix

Conflict Type Resolution Method Decision Maker Escalation
资源竞争(同一 Worker 争夺) 优先级排队 Orchestrator CEO
决策冲突(A/B Agent 结论矛盾) 数据裁决 数据优先级最高 Agent CEO
范围冲突(任务边界重叠) 范围重定 发起方 Agent CTO
质量标准冲突(评估标准不一致) CQO 标准 CQO-001 CEO
安全分歧(安全 vs 速度) CISO 优先 CISO-001 不可升级
合规分歧(法律 vs 业务) CLO 优先 CLO-001 不可升级

Severity-Based Response

Severity Definition Response Time Process
P0 系统级冲突,影响多个 Agent 15 min CEO 立即仲裁
P1 关键任务阻塞 1 hour Orchestrator 调解
P2 效率降低,可 workaround 4 hours Agent 间协商
P3 低优先级分歧 Next sync 记录,延后处理

Conflict Resolution Flow

Agent A ←冲突→ Agent B
       ↓
  Orchestrator 检测到冲突
       ↓
  分类 → 资源/决策/范围/质量/安全/合规
       ↓
  规则匹配 → 已有规则?
       ↓ YES          ↓ NO
  自动裁决        调解协商(4h窗口)
       ↓                    ↓
  执行裁决        达成共识?
              YES ↓      NO ↓
           执行         升级 P0/P1
                         ↓
                   CEO 仲裁(不可上诉)

Typical Collaboration Scenarios

Scenario 1: 舆情危机

触发:重大负面事件
参与:CMO(公关) + CLO(法律) + CTO(技术) + COO(运营)

CMO → 起草声明(情感层)
CLO → 合规审查(法律边界)
CTO → 技术应对(数据保留/修复)
COO → 运营调度(资源分配)
CEO → 最终拍板(一个声音对外)

Scenario 2: Agent 淘汰

触发:TSR 连续2个周期下降 > 10%
参与:CHO(主导) + CEO(被审查) + CQO(数据)

CHO 发起审查 → 数据收集 → 根因分析
→ 改进计划 / 退役决策
→ CEO 接受 CHO 决策(制度约束)

Scenario 3: 投资决策

触发:重大资本支出或战略投资
参与:CFO(财务) + CEO(战略) + CRO(风险) + CLO(合规)

CFO → 单位经济学分析(NPV/IRR/跑道)
CRO → 风险评估(下行风险/黑天鹅)
CLO → 合规可行性(监管/合同约束)
CEO → 最终投资决策(综合三方意见)

Scenario 4: MVP 验证

触发:产品功能上线前验证
参与:CTO(技术) + CPO(产品) + CMO(市场) + CFO(财务)

CTO → 技术可行性(实现路径)
CPO → 产品市场匹配(用户价值)
CMO → 市场需求验证(GTM 策略)
CFO → 商业可行性(定价/Unit Economics)
CEO → 最终上线决策

Natural Language Commands

"Resolve conflict between CFO and CTO" → Resolution flow
"Handle a P0 crisis" → P0 escalation path
"Mediate scope dispute between agents" → Scope resolution
"Run our crisis playbook" → Crisis scenario template