360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Learnloop

核心功能:将用户对Claude的修正、偏好、任务异常等内容,分类存入Claude本地自动记忆系统,新会话自动加载。典型场景:纠正错误后无需重复说明,留存角色偏好,记录工具坑点、项目约束等。输入为用户的纠正话术、偏好表述等触发内容,输出为保存状态提示或不保存的原因说明,记忆本地存储且分类管理。

jiajiaoy
jiajiaoy
热度 25.39
最近更新 2026-05-14 17:21:47
分类:知识依赖:读写文件应用场景:笔记整理

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add learnloop
Metadata
name
learnloop
version
1.0.0
author
jiajiaoy
homepage
https://clawhub.ai/skills/learnloop
description
Continuous learning protocol for Claude — captures corrections, errors, and user preferences into native auto-memory so the next session remembers. Stop teaching Claude the same thing twice.
keywords
["continuous learning","persistent memory","auto-memory","learning loop","knowledge capture","self-improvement","memory protocol","Claude forgets","Claude repeats mistakes","AI forgets corrections","teach Claude twice","Claude has no memory","lost context","AI amnesia","AI agent","agentic","Claude Code","LLM memory","AI productivity","agentic memory","smarter Claude","make Claude better","Claude improvement","improve AI","agent improvement","持续学习","自动记忆","智能记忆","不再重复错误","AI记忆","ThinkStack"]

LearnLoop

Claude forgets everything between sessions by default. LearnLoop closes that loop — every correction, every error, every preference is captured into Claude Code's native auto-memory and auto-loaded next time.

The Core Problem

Without persistent learning, every session starts from zero:

  • You correct Claude → it agrees → next session, same mistake
  • You explain your role and preferences → gone tomorrow
  • A command fails with a known fix → re-debugged from scratch
  • An external tool has a gotcha → relearned on every encounter
  • You discover a better approach → never reused

The result: smart in the moment, amnesic over time. Your time is spent re-teaching, not advancing.

Why Native Memory

LearnLoop writes directly to Claude Code's auto-memory system at ~/.claude/projects/<project-id>/memory/:

  • Auto-injected — MEMORY.md is loaded into every new session, no manual recall needed
  • Typed — entries are classified (user / feedback / project / reference) so retrieval is sharp
  • Linked — memories cross-reference via [[slug]] for graph-style recall
  • Local — nothing leaves your machine

No .learnings/ folder to maintain, no separate file to read, no "did I check the log?" overhead.

When to Activate

Trigger LearnLoop on any of these moments:

Trigger Save As Example
User corrects Claude ("No, that's wrong", "Actually...") feedback "Don't use git add . — too broad"
Command or tool fails unexpectedly project or feedback "npm test requires Node 20+ in this repo"
User shares role, expertise, or preference user "Senior backend dev, new to React"
External system referenced reference "Bugs tracked in Linear project INGEST"
Knowledge turned out to be outdated feedback "API moved from v1 to v2 in March"
Better approach discovered for recurring task feedback "Use rg not grep — 10x faster in this monorepo"
Project deadline or constraint mentioned project "Mobile freeze starts 2026-03-05"

If you'd otherwise say "I'll keep that in mind for next time" — that's the trigger. You can't keep it in mind. Save it.

The Protocol

Step 1: Detect the Trigger

Watch for the seven moments above. The two strongest signals:

  • User uses corrective language: "no", "actually", "wrong", "stop", "don't"
  • Validated success on a non-obvious choice: user accepts an unusual approach without pushback ("yes exactly", "perfect")

Save from failure AND success. Saving only corrections produces a fearful agent; saving validated wins keeps you bold.

Step 2: Classify the Memory Type

Type Use For
user Role, expertise, goals, communication preferences
feedback Behavioral rules: do this, don't do that, why
project Ongoing initiatives, deadlines, who/why context
reference Pointers to external systems (Linear, Grafana, Slack channels)

If unsure, ask: does this guide my future behavior? (feedback) or describe a person? (user) or a workstream? (project) or point elsewhere? (reference).

Step 3: Write the Memory File

Path: ~/.claude/projects/<project-id>/memory/<short-kebab-slug>.md

Frontmatter format:

---
name: short-kebab-slug
description: one-line summary, specific enough to judge relevance later
metadata:
  type: feedback
---

Body structure for feedback and project types — lead with the rule/fact, then:

  • Why: the reason (often a past incident or stated preference)
  • How to apply: when this guidance kicks in

The Why is load-bearing. Without it, future-you can't judge edge cases — you'll either follow blindly or ignore stale rules.

Step 4: Update MEMORY.md Index

MEMORY.md is the index loaded into every session. One line per entry, under ~150 chars:

- [Title](slug.md) — one-line hook on when it matters

Keep it under 200 lines. If MEMORY.md fills up, consolidate related entries into single files rather than truncating.

Step 5: Verify Before Recalling

Memories age. Before acting on a recalled fact:

  • Names a file path? Check it exists.
  • Names a function or flag? grep for it.
  • Summarizes repo state? Prefer git log over the snapshot.

If the memory conflicts with current reality, update or delete the memory. Don't act on stale memory.

What NOT to Save

These belong in code, git, or scratch — not memory:

  • Code patterns, architecture, file paths derivable from the project
  • Git history or who-changed-what (use git log / git blame)
  • Bug-fix recipes — the fix lives in the commit
  • Anything already in CLAUDE.md
  • Ephemeral task state (use TodoWrite or a plan instead)

Even when the user says "remember this PR list" — ask what was surprising about it. The surprise is the memory. The list is not.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Save-everything spam — memory becomes noise; future-you ignores it
  • Skipping the "Why" — rule without reason becomes dogma or gets discarded
  • Duplicate entries — check existing memories before writing a new one
  • Cargo-culting from one session — confirmed-twice beats said-once for behavioral rules
  • Trusting stale memory — always verify file/symbol/state before acting on a recalled claim

Output Format

When you decide to save:

[LearnLoop] Saving as <type>: <one-line summary>
  → memory/<slug>.md
  → MEMORY.md updated

When you decide not to save:

[LearnLoop] Noted but not saved — <reason>

Be visible about the loop. Silent saves hide the mechanism; users should see what you remembered and what you didn't.

Pairs Well With

LearnLoop is part of the ThinkStack — meta-skills that compound:

  • clarity-first — understand the request before you act
  • thinkdeep — reason through complex problems
  • honest-critic — push back instead of validating
  • task-pilot — execute structured plans
  • learnloop — never lose what you learned
openclaw install learnloop
openclaw install honest-critic
openclaw install thinkdeep
openclaw install clarity-first
openclaw install task-pilot