Jason Academic Writing

核心功能涵盖学术论文从文献调研、结构化写作、反幻觉完整性校验（引用/数据/主张验证）、5角色多Agent评审、针对性修订到生成可审计流程记录的全闭环流程，各阶段设质量门槛，未达标可循环优化。适合撰写研究论文、需引用验证、反幻觉检查、多视角评审或留存可审计记录的场景，支持全流程或单阶段运行，输出手稿、证据集等文件。

ithacajason

热度 48.90

最近更新 2026-05-11 17:41:20

分类：创作依赖：代码执行 / 第三方 API / 读写文件 / 内部调用大模型应用场景：研究 / 报告撰写 / 校对润色 / 摘要总结

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent，它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill： npx secure-skills-cli add jason-academic-writing

Metadata

name: jason-academic-writing
description: Complete academic paper writing pipeline with integrity checks and multi-agent review system. Optimized prompts for Methods/Results/Discussion sections. Features self-counterargument framework, bias matrix, and overclaim self-audit. Use when writing research papers, need citation verification, anti-hallucination checks, multi-perspective review, or auditable process records.
version: 1.0.1
requires: {"env":["OPENAI_API_KEY","OPENAI_BASE_URL"]}

Academic Writing Pipeline

End-to-end academic paper production with built-in quality gates and multi-agent review.

Pipeline Overview

Research → Write → Integrity Check → Review → Revise → Summary

Each stage has defined inputs/outputs and quality gates. The pipeline is non-linear: stages may loop (Review → Revise → Re-Review) until quality threshold met.

Stage Details

Stage 1: Research

Goal: Gather and organize evidence.

Actions:

Literature search via Semantic Scholar API
Filter by relevance score ≥ 0.5
Grade evidence level (A: meta-analysis, B: RCT, C: observational, D: opinion)
Output: research/evidence.json

Script: scripts/research.py

Stage 2: Write

Goal: Generate structured manuscript.

Actions:

Build argument chain from evidence
Generate sections: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion
Track citation markers for each claim
Output: draft/manuscript.md

Script: scripts/write.py

Stage 3: Integrity Check (CRITICAL)

Goal: Anti-hallucination verification.

Check types:

Citation verification: DOI exists? Authors match? Year correct?
Data verification: Numbers match tables/figures?
Claim verification: Evidence supports assertion?

Threshold: Must pass 100% of checks to proceed.

Script: scripts/integrity_check.py

APIs used:

Semantic Scholar (https://api.semanticscholar.org)
CrossRef DOI (https://api.crossref.org/works/)

Stage 4: Review (5-Person Panel)

Agents:

Role	Focus	Score Weight
Editor-in-Chief	Contribution, journal fit	30%
Methodology	Methods, stats, reproducibility	25%
Domain Expert	Related work, theory	20%
Devil's Advocate	Strongest counter-arguments	15%
Synthesizer	Merge opinions, roadmap	10%

Decision mapping:

≥80: Accept
65-79: Minor Revision
50-64: Major Revision
<50: Reject

Script: scripts/review.py

Stage 5: Revise

Goal: Address reviewer feedback.

Actions:

Parse Synthesizer roadmap
Generate revision plan with priorities
Rewrite affected sections
Re-run Integrity Check

Script: scripts/revise.py

Stage 6: Process Summary

Goal: Auditable record.

Output: summary.json containing:

Timeline of each stage
Decision points and scores
Integrity check results
Reviewer scores and comments
Revision history

Script: scripts/summary.py

Configuration

Edit config.yaml for:

Model selection (default: qwen3.5-plus)
Temperature (default: 0.3 for stability)
Review thresholds
API keys

Usage

# Full pipeline
python scripts/main.py --topic "your research topic"

# Single stage
python scripts/main.py --stage integrity-check --input draft/manuscript.md

# With custom config
python scripts/main.py --config custom_config.yaml

Quality Gates

Gate	Requirement	Action on Fail
Evidence	≥5 Grade A/B sources	Return to Research
Integrity	100% verification	Return to Write
Review	≥65 score	Loop Revise
Final Integrity	100% verification	Block submission

Key Principles

Integrity First: Citation verification is non-negotiable
Quantified Review: Scores enable objective decisions
Loopable Pipeline: Revision cycles until threshold met
Auditable Output: Process Summary for journal submission

Reference Files

references/review_rubric.md - Detailed scoring criteria
references/evidence_levels.md - Evidence grading standards
references/citation_styles.md - Journal formatting guides