360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

AI Agent Governance(AI智能体治理)

这是面向金融机构的AI代理治理框架,核心功能包括企业AI代理盘点分类、合规政策制定与核查、影子AI检测,以及生成符合CBIRC/CFCA要求的审计和监管报告。典型场景涵盖应对金融监管合规、Microsoft Agent 365部署管控、内部AI风险排查。输入为企业AI使用现状、监管需求等信息,输出结构化清单、合规差距矩阵、风险报告等

gechengling
gechengling
热度 12.73
最近更新 2026-08-28 00:07:16
分类:安全依赖:第三方 API / 读写文件 / 内部调用大模型 / 联网浏览搜索应用场景:财务 / 法律文档 / 报告撰写 / 工作流 ...

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add ai-agent-governance
Metadata
name
Agent Governance Assistant
slug
ai-agent-governance
description
AI-powered enterprise AI agent governance framework — audit agent behavior, enforce security policies, ensure CBIRC/CFCA compliance, detect shadow AI, and generate governance reports. Built for IT risk managers, compliance officers, and enterprise AI leaders in financial institutions. Keywords: AI agent governance, enterprise AI, agent compliance, AI security policy, CBIRC, CFCA, shadow AI detection, agent audit, Microsoft Agent 365, Copilot Studio, China AI regulation, Agent治理, 企业AI, AI合规, 影子AI检测, AI审计, NFRA AI合规.
version
1.0.0

Agent Governance Assistant

Overview

A comprehensive AI-powered framework for governing enterprise AI agents — from audit trails and policy enforcement to regulatory compliance and risk reporting. As enterprise AI agents (Microsoft Agent 365, Copilot Studio, custom agents) proliferate, governance has become the #1 blocker to adoption. This skill bridges the gap between AI capability and enterprise control.

Title

Enterprise AI Agent Governance Framework — Audit · Secure · Comply

Triggers

  • "agent governance" / "AI agent管理" / "代理治理"
  • "enterprise AI compliance" / "企业AI合规"
  • "shadow AI detection" / "影子AI排查"
  • "AI policy enforcement" / "AI策略执行"
  • "agent audit trail" / "代理审计日志"
  • "Microsoft Agent 365 governance" / "Agent 365治理"
  • "AI risk report" / "AI风险报告"
  • "Copilot Studio compliance" / "Copilot合规"
  • "China AI regulation" / "中国AI监管"
  • "CBIRC AI guidance" / "银保监会AI指引"

Workflow

Phase 1 — Agent Inventory Discovery

Step 1.1: Scan for Active AI Agents

Generate a structured inventory of all AI agents in the enterprise environment.

Input required:

  • List of known AI platforms in use (e.g., Microsoft 365 Copilot, Salesforce Einstein, custom LangChain agents, RPA bots)
  • Department ownership mapping
  • API endpoints or integration points

Output: Agent Inventory Table

Agent ID Platform Owner Department Capabilities Data Access Level Last Active
AG-001 Microsoft Agent 365 IT Admin Finance Email drafting, meeting prep Full mailbox 2026-05-07

Step 1.2: Classify Agent Risk Level

Assign risk tier (Low / Medium / High / Critical) based on:

  • Data sensitivity (PII, financial, health, IP)
  • External interaction (internet, customers, third parties)
  • Autonomy level (advisory only → full automation)
  • Regulatory exposure (CBIRC, CFCA, personal information protection)

Risk Classification Matrix:

Tier Criteria Example Audit Frequency
Critical Customer-facing + financial data + high autonomy AI underwriting agent Weekly
High Internal + sensitive data + medium autonomy AI claims processor Monthly
Medium Internal + general data + advisory only AI meeting summarizer Quarterly
Low Internal + no sensitive data AI email categorizer Bi-annual

Phase 2 — Policy Framework Design

Step 2.1: Define Governance Policies

Generate tailored governance policies based on enterprise type and regulatory context.

For China Financial Institutions (CBIRC/CFCA):

POLICY: CFCA-AI-001 — Agent Data Minimization
All AI agents must process only minimum necessary personal data.
Agents cannot retain PII beyond the transaction completion window.
Annual data audit required.

POLICY: CBIRC-AI-007 — Model Transparency
All AI-assisted decisions in underwriting/claims must provide
human-override capability and explainability documentation.

POLICY: AI-ENTERPRISE-003 — Agent Registration
All production AI agents must be registered in the Enterprise
Agent Registry with documented purpose, data scope, and owner.
Unregistered agents are prohibited from accessing customer data.

Step 2.2: Policy Compliance Checker

For each registered agent, evaluate against all applicable policies.

Input: Agent inventory + policy list Output: Compliance gap matrix with severity scores


Phase 3 — Shadow AI Detection

Step 3.1: Identify Unauthorized Agent Usage

Scan for signs of shadow AI — employees using personal AI tools on corporate data.

Detection indicators:

  • Third-party AI API calls from corporate networks (non-approved domains)
  • AI tool usage logs in DLP (Data Loss Prevention) systems
  • Browser extensions accessing corporate APIs
  • Unsanctioned Zapier/Make/n8n workflows connecting to company data

Output: Shadow AI Exposure Report

Finding Risk Level Data at Risk Recommended Action
Employee using free ChatGPT API for customer email drafting CRITICAL Customer PII + contract terms Immediate block + compliance training
Unsanctioned n8n workflow syncing CRM to personal AI tool HIGH Contact data + deal values Replace with approved integration

Phase 4 — Audit Trail & Reporting

Step 4.1: Generate Governance Audit Report

Produce a structured audit report for internal risk committees and external regulators.

Report Sections:

  1. Executive Summary (1 page)
  2. Agent Inventory & Risk Classification
  3. Policy Compliance Scorecard
  4. Shadow AI Findings
  5. Open Risks & Remediation Roadmap
  6. Appendix: Agent Decision Logs (sample)

Step 4.2: Generate Regulatory Filing

Format findings as a CBIRC/CFCA-compliant governance disclosure.


Input / Output Examples

Example 1: Enterprise Agent Audit

Input:

We have 12 AI agents across Finance, Claims, and Sales departments.
Recent CBIRC guidance requires quarterly AI governance reporting.
We discovered 3 employees using personal AI tools for work tasks.

Output:

## Phase 1: Agent Inventory
[Structured table of 12 agents with risk tiers]

## Phase 2: Policy Gap Analysis
- 4 agents non-compliant with CFCA-AI-001 (data minimization)
- 2 agents lack human-override capability (CBIRC-AI-007)
- 6 agents unregistered (AI-ENTERPRISE-003 violation)

## Phase 3: Shadow AI Findings
[Shadow AI report with 3 findings]

## Phase 4: Compliance Score — 58/100
Recommended actions prioritized by risk.

## Report ready for CBIRC Q2 submission.

Example 2: Microsoft Agent 365 Governance Setup

Input:

We are deploying Microsoft Agent 365 across 200 users.
IT needs to configure governance controls before go-live.
Finance and Claims departments need different permission levels.

Output:

## Agent 365 Governance Configuration

### Recommended Permission Matrix
| Department | Agent Capabilities | Data Scope | Human-in-Loop | Audit Level |
|------------|-------------------|------------|---------------|-------------|
| Finance | Report generation, variance analysis | Financial data only | Required for >¥100K | Full |
| Claims | Document review, fraud flag | Claims data | Required for >¥10K | Full |
| Sales | Lead scoring, email drafting | CRM data | Advisory only | Standard |

### Governance Policies to Enable
1. Data Loss Prevention (DLP) rules for PII in agent prompts
2. Agent activity logging to Sentinel/Log Analytics
3. Approval workflows for high-stakes agent actions
4. Monthly governance review dashboard

### Shadow AI Pre-emption
Block list: [personal-ai-tool-1.com, ai-tool-free.xyz]
Allow list: [Copilot, Agent 365, approved-vendor-ai.com]

Notes & Best Practices

  1. Start with inventory before policy. You cannot govern what you cannot see.
  2. China-specific: For CBIRC/CFCA regulated entities, always include PIPL (个人信息保护法) compliance in the policy framework. Agents processing insurance claims data are subject to strict data minimization requirements.
  3. Human-in-the-loop is non-negotiable for any agent making or materially influencing financial decisions.
  4. Shadow AI is the #1 undetected risk — prioritize network-level API monitoring.
  5. Update agent registry quarterly — AI agent proliferation is fast; stale inventories create blind spots.
  6. Leverage Microsoft Purview for data classification feeding into agent governance policies.
  7. Regulatory alignment: Check current CBIRC AI guidance, CFCA fintech guidelines, and the generative AI regulation framework when generating policies.

Author: @gechengling | Skill: agent-governance-assistant | clawhub.ai/gechengling/agent-governance-assistant