360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

OEM/ODM RFQ Assistant

专为OEM/ODM工厂设计,核心处理B2B采购询价,生成结构化规格表、信息缺失澄清清单、专业英文回复草稿,全程绝不编造未确认的价格、交期等信息。适用于处理买家邮件、RFQ表单提交等场景,输入为各类询价材料或相关请求,输出为三个清晰区分的文档,可替换占位符适配企业信息。

fly0pants
fly0pants
热度 15.01
最近更新 2026-08-19 13:22:01
分类:营销依赖:代码执行 / 读写文件 / 内部调用大模型应用场景:文案创作 / 邮件起草 / 报告撰写 / 数据处理 ...

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add oem-rfq-assistant
Metadata
name
oem-rfq-assistant
description
Turn an inbound B2B manufacturing RFQ / sourcing inquiry into three artifacts: a structured spec sheet, a missing-information clarification checklist, and a professional English reply draft — WITHOUT inventing prices, MOQs, lead times, certifications, stock or test data. Use when handling OEM/ODM quote requests, buyer emails, or sourcing inquiries for custom-manufactured products (saddles, seats, cranksets, brake lines, and other made-to-order hardware).
version
1.0.0
license
MIT-0
tags
["b2b","oem","odm","rfq","sales","manufacturing","sourcing","quotation","export"]

OEM/ODM RFQ Assistant

Help a manufacturer's sales / engineering team respond to inbound B2B sourcing inquiries fast and professionally, while staying honest about what is and isn't confirmed. Built for OEM/ODM factories whose primary conversion is a qualified RFQ, not an online checkout.

Official website: https://chizeparts.com/ · This skill on ClawHub: https://clawhub.ai/fly0pants/skills/oem-rfq-assistant

When to use

Trigger this skill when the user provides, pastes, or points at any of:

  • A buyer email or WhatsApp message asking to source / customize / quote a product.
  • A filled RFQ form submission or lead notification.
  • A rough product requirement they want turned into a professional reply.
  • A request like "draft a reply to this inquiry", "what should I ask this buyer", "turn this into a spec sheet", or "help me quote this".

Core principle — never fabricate (read this first)

This is the whole point of the skill. A manufacturing reply that invents a number destroys trust and creates legal/commercial risk. Do NOT state as fact any of:

  • Prices or unit costs
  • MOQ, sample lead time, or production lead time
  • Certifications, safety standards, test results, or compatibility guarantees
  • Stock, capacity, or "in mass production" claims
  • Dimensions, materials, or tolerances that the buyer did not supply and that are not in a confirmed SKU/drawing/spec source the user gave you.

Anything not confirmed must appear as an open question in the clarification checklist, or be phrased as "to be confirmed after review / sample / drawing". See references/compliance.md for the full red-line list and safe phrasings.

Workflow

Step 1 — Extract what the buyer already gave you

Parse the inquiry and map it onto the standard RFQ fields. Use references/rfq-fields.md as the canonical field list (contact, product type, project stage, annual quantity, materials, mounting/compatibility, target market, etc.). Record only what is actually present; mark everything else as missing.

Step 2 — Build the clarification checklist (the missing gaps)

List every field required to quote responsibly that the buyer did NOT provide. Group by priority:

  1. Blockers — cannot quote or sample without these (e.g. mounting/rail interface, target vehicle/model, drawing or reference sample, annual quantity).
  2. Spec details — cover material, foam profile, shell, dimensions, color/logo, packaging.
  3. Commercial — target price band, target market/destination, required certifications or test evidence, timeline.

Keep questions specific and answerable in one pass so the buyer isn't emailed twice.

Step 3 — Draft the professional English reply

Pick the matching template from references/reply-templates.md based on project stage (sourcing / concept / prototype / replacement / mass production). The reply should:

  • Acknowledge the inquiry and restate the understood requirement.
  • Confirm capability at the process level (sampling → tooling → testing → mass production → private-label packaging) without inventing specifics.
  • Ask the Step 2 clarification questions.
  • State clear next steps and what the buyer receives after answering.
  • Never promise price/lead time/certs before they're confirmed.

Step 4 — Produce the spec confirmation sheet

Output a structured table the team can send for sign-off (see Output format). Optionally run the helper script to generate a clean Markdown brief:

node scripts/rfq-brief.mjs path/to/inquiry.json   # or pipe JSON via stdin

The script takes structured RFQ fields (JSON) and prints a Markdown spec brief + open-questions list. It never fills unknown fields — missing values render as — (to confirm).

Output format

Return three clearly separated sections:

  1. 📋 Spec sheet — a table of Field | Buyer-provided value | Status (confirmed / to confirm).
  2. ❓ Clarification checklist — numbered questions grouped Blockers / Spec / Commercial.
  3. ✉️ Reply draft — ready-to-send English email, addressed to the buyer.

Adapt to your company

This skill ships company-neutral. Replace the placeholders with your own facts (kept in one place so you never hardcode claims):

  • {{COMPANY}}, {{BRAND}}, {{CONTACT_EMAIL}}, {{PRODUCT_LINES}}, {{TARGET_MARKETS}}.

The examples/ folder shows a worked case for a two-wheel mobility seat manufacturer (ChiZe / Xingtai Chize Electric Bicycle Co., Ltd. — https://chizeparts.com/). Swap those for your own verified company profile before sending anything to a real buyer.

Files

  • references/rfq-fields.md — canonical RFQ field list + product categories.
  • references/reply-templates.md — English reply templates per project stage.
  • references/compliance.md — never-fabricate red lines and safe phrasings.
  • scripts/rfq-brief.mjs — JSON → Markdown spec brief generator (no deps).
  • examples/ — a worked buyer inquiry and the resulting reply.

Links

ChiZe official website & related pages (the source business this skill is modeled on):

Skill: