360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Protocol Deviation Classifier

这是符合GCP、ICH E6等监管标准的临床试验方案偏离分类工具,核心功能包括自动判定主次偏离、评估对受试者安全、数据完整性及试验科学性的影响,还能生成合规报告,全面支持中文临床试验场景。适用于临床试验质控、偏离影响评估、合规申报及审计准备等场景,可通过Python API或CLI使用,输入偏离描述或类型,输出带监管依据的分类结果与合规报告。

ewankeynes
ewankeynes
热度 52.16
最近更新 2026-07-16 22:09:39
分类:安全依赖:代码执行 / 读写文件应用场景:报告撰写 / 法律文档 / 数据处理

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add protocol-deviation-classifier
Metadata
name
protocol-deviation-classifier
description
Determine whether an incident in a clinical trial is a "major deviation" or "minor deviation". Function: Automatically classify protocol deviations in clinical trials based on GCP/ICH E6 standards, assessing the impact on subject safety, data integrity, and trial scientific validity. Trigger: When classification assessment of protocol deviations is needed, input deviation event description or deviation type. Use cases: Clinical trial quality management, deviation impact assessment, regulatory submission preparation, audit preparation.
version
1.0.0
category
Pharma
tags
["clinical-trials","gcp","compliance","deviation","quality","ich-e6","ctm"]
author
AIPOCH
license
MIT
status
Draft
risk_level
Medium
skill_type
Tool/Script
owner
AIPOCH
reviewer
last_updated
2026-02-06

Protocol Deviation Classifier

Clinical trial protocol deviation classification tool, based on GCP and ICH E6 guidelines, automatically determines whether deviations belong to "major deviations" or "minor deviations".

Features

  • Automatic Classification: Automatically determines severity based on deviation description
  • Risk Assessment: Assesses impact on subject safety, data integrity, and scientific validity
  • Regulatory Basis: Classification basis complies with GCP, ICH E6, and FDA/EMA guidelines
  • Report Generation: Generates deviation classification reports that meet regulatory requirements
  • Chinese Support: Full support for Chinese clinical trial scenarios

Deviation Classification Standards

Major/Critical Deviation

Deviations that may affect trial data integrity, subject safety, or trial scientific validity:

Category Examples
Informed Consent Performing research procedures without informed consent, using expired/incorrect informed consent forms
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Enrolling subjects who don't meet inclusion criteria, enrolling subjects who meet exclusion criteria
Investigational Product Overdose administration, contraindicated concomitant medication, incorrect route of administration, randomization error
Safety Not performing safety monitoring as required by protocol, missing SAE/SUSAR reports, delayed reporting
Blinding Unblinding by unauthorized personnel, unrecorded emergency unblinding procedures
Data Integrity Falsifying/fabricating data, systematic missing of critical data
Prohibited Operations Violating key operational procedures of trial protocol, not performing key efficacy assessments

Minor Deviation

Deviations unlikely to affect trial data integrity, subject safety, or trial scientific validity:

Category Examples
Visit Window Slightly exceeding visit time window (e.g., within a few days), delay of non-critical visits
Sample Collection Minor timing deviations in non-critical sample collection, slight delays in sample processing
Questionnaire Completion Quality of life questionnaires/diary cards submitted a few days late
Data Recording Delays in non-critical data recording, spelling/formatting errors
Procedure Execution Adjustment of secondary procedure execution order, omission of non-critical assessments (e.g., height measurement)
Documentation Delays in source document signatures, missing secondary documents (e.g., non-critical examination reports)

Usage

Python API

from scripts.main import DeviationClassifier

# Initialize classifier
classifier = DeviationClassifier()

# Classify single deviation
result = classifier.classify(
    description="Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
    deviation_type="Visit Window"
)
print(result.classification)  # "Minor Deviation"
print(result.confidence)      # 0.92
print(result.rationale)       # Classification rationale explanation

# Batch classification
deviations = [
    {"description": "Blood sample collected without informed consent", "type": "Informed Consent"},
    {"description": "Quality of life questionnaire submitted 3 days late", "type": "Data Collection"}
]
batch_results = classifier.classify_batch(deviations)

# Generate report
report = classifier.generate_report(batch_results)

CLI Usage

# Classify single deviation
python scripts/main.py classify --description "Subject visit delayed by 2 days" --type "Visit Window"

# Batch classification from file
python scripts/main.py batch --input deviations.json --output report.json

# Interactive classification
python scripts/main.py interactive

# Assess deviation impact
python scripts/main.py assess \
  --description "Subject accidentally took double dose of investigational drug" \
  --safety-impact high \
  --data-impact medium \
  --scientific-impact medium

Input Format

JSON Input File Format:

[
  {
    "id": "DEV-001",
    "description": "Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
    "type": "Visit Window",
    "occurrence_date": "2024-01-15",
    "severity_factors": {
      "safety_impact": "none",
      "data_impact": "low",
      "scientific_impact": "low"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "DEV-002",
    "description": "Blood collection performed without informed consent",
    "type": "Informed Consent",
    "severity_factors": {
      "safety_impact": "high",
      "data_impact": "high",
      "scientific_impact": "high"
    }
  }
]

Output Format

Classification Result:

{
  "id": "DEV-001",
  "classification": "Minor Deviation",
  "classification_en": "Minor Deviation",
  "confidence": 0.92,
  "rationale": "Visit time window slightly delayed (2 days), does not affect subject safety, data integrity, or trial scientific validity.",
  "risk_factors": {
    "safety_risk": "none",
    "data_integrity_risk": "low",
    "scientific_validity_risk": "none"
  },
  "regulatory_basis": [
    "ICH E6(R2) Section 4.5",
    "GCP Section 6.4.4"
  ],
  "recommended_actions": [
    "Document in file",
    "Track trends"
  ]
}

Classification Algorithm

Classification based on the following assessment dimensions:

  1. Subject Safety Impact (Safety Impact)

    • None: No impact
    • Low: Minor impact
    • Medium: Moderate impact
    • High: Serious impact
  2. Data Integrity Impact (Data Integrity Impact)

    • None: No impact
    • Low: Minor impact on non-critical data
    • Medium: Partial impact on critical data
    • High: Serious damage to critical data
  3. Trial Scientific Validity Impact (Scientific Validity Impact)

    • None: No impact
    • Low: Minor impact on statistical power
    • Medium: May affect primary endpoint
    • High: Seriously affects trial conclusion

Classification Rules:

  • Any dimension is High → Major Deviation
  • Safety dimension is Medium and Data/Science either is Medium+ → Major Deviation
  • Other cases → Minor Deviation

Regulatory Basis

  • ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice Guideline
  • ICH E6(R3) Good Clinical Practice Guideline (Draft)
  • FDA 21 CFR Part 312 (IND Regulations)
  • FDA Guidance for Industry: Oversight of Clinical Investigations
  • EMA Reflection Paper on Risk Based Quality Management
  • NMPA Good Clinical Practice for Drug Clinical Trials

Dependencies

  • Python 3.8+
  • No third-party dependencies (pure Python standard library implementation)

Notes

  1. This tool provides classification recommendations, final determination must be confirmed by clinical quality assurance personnel
  2. Serious/critical deviations must be reported to sponsor and ethics committee immediately
  3. It is recommended to regularly review deviation trends and implement CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions)
  4. Classification standards may vary by regulatory agency, trial type, and protocol requirements

Risk Assessment

Risk Indicator Assessment Level
Code Execution Python/R scripts executed locally Medium
Network Access No external API calls Low
File System Access Read input files, write output files Medium
Instruction Tampering Standard prompt guidelines Low
Data Exposure Output files saved to workspace Low

Security Checklist

  • No hardcoded credentials or API keys
  • No unauthorized file system access (../)
  • Output does not expose sensitive information
  • Prompt injection protections in place
  • Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
  • Output directory restricted to workspace
  • Script execution in sandboxed environment
  • Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
  • Dependencies audited

Prerequisites

# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt

Evaluation Criteria

Success Metrics

  • Successfully executes main functionality
  • Output meets quality standards
  • Handles edge cases gracefully
  • Performance is acceptable

Test Cases

  1. Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
  2. Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
  3. Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

Lifecycle Status

  • Current Stage: Draft
  • Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
  • Known Issues: None
  • Planned Improvements:
    • Performance optimization
    • Additional feature support