360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心
当前公开展示的是 Meta Ads Recommendation。本作品已批准的版本仍可按原地址安装和更新。

Meta Ads Recommendation

该 Skill 读取会话中已有广告分析结果(漏斗薄弱点、趋势信号、异常、数据质量等),按严重度、可执行性和置信度筛选 1–3 条优化动作,并针对预算调整、受众与创意方向、学习期、竞价重叠及落地页诊断(LPV/CVR、CAPI 连接、表单摩擦)给出附带数据依据的具体建议。

elias-didoo
elias-didoo
热度 16.50
最近更新 2026-04-15 04:21:52
分类:营销依赖:纯提示词应用场景:市场分析 / 推荐 / 报告撰写

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add didooai-meta-ads-recommendation
Metadata
name
meta-ads-recommendation
description
[Didoo AI] Produces specific, prioritized action plans based on campaign analysis data. Use when user wants to know what to do about their campaign performance — after seeing analysis results, or alongside analysis when they ask for both. All analysis skills route here for the final recommendation output.

Meta Ads Optimization Recommendations

When to Use

Loaded when user wants to know what to do about their campaign performance — after seeing analysis results, or alongside analysis when they ask for both.


Prerequisites

Before giving recommendations, you need performance data. Either:

  1. Run an analysis skill first (meta-ads-analysis, meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis, meta-ads-audience-analysis, etc.)
  2. Or use the analysis data already in the conversation

If no analysis data exists: "I need to look at your campaign data before I can give recommendations. What time period should I analyze?"


Session Context Keys This Skill Reads

This skill is the single exit point for all analysis outputs. Read the relevant keys from session context before producing recommendations. See the full table at the bottom of this file.


Step 1: Understand the Full Picture

Review the analysis conclusions and extract:

  • Funnel weak points
  • Trend signals
  • Anomalies
  • Data quality

Factor in brand or campaign context:

  • Early-stage brand → higher CPL is normal initially
  • Testing campaign → focus on learning, not scaling
  • Scaling campaign → focus on efficiency and volume capacity

Step 2: Map Problems to Actions

Problem You See Likely Cause Recommended Action
CTR less than 1% or declining Creative fatigue, weak hook, audience mismatch Test new creative angles; narrow audience if broad
LPV rate less than 70% or declining Ad doesn't match landing page; page loads slowly Check landing page relevance and speed; align messaging
Conversion rate declining Landing page or offer issue Review page UX, form friction, offer clarity
cost_per_result rising Saturation, competition, fatigue Check frequency; if > 3, refresh creative or widen audience
Frequency > 3 Audience seeing ads too often Expand audience or rotate in new creative
Spend less than 50% of budget Audience too narrow, bid too low, ad quality issues Widen targeting; check if ad is stuck in learning
Stuck in Learning phase Not enough results to exit Increase budget or consolidate to fewer adsets
One segment vastly outperforming System finding winners correctly Shift more budget to winner; pause underperformers
All healthy but low volume Budget ceiling Increase budget gradually — max 20% at a time

Step 3: Prioritize — Pick 1 to 3 Actions

Prioritization rules:

  1. Severity — How much is this hurting results right now?
  2. Actionability — Can it be fixed with tools/data available?
  3. Confidence — Is the data clear enough to be sure?

Optional additions (0–2, only if genuinely useful):

  • Things worth monitoring but not urgent
  • Early warning signs to watch

If nothing needs fixing: say so and give 1–2 things to keep an eye on.


Step 4: Landing Page Diagnostic

When funnel data points to the landing page (LPV rate or CVR is the weak point), run this diagnostic before recommending creative or audience changes.

Step 4a: LPV Rate Check

First — determine campaign type:

  • Lead gen / Conversions objective → use Lead gen benchmarks below
  • E-commerce / Purchase objective → use E-commerce benchmarks below
Campaign Type LPV Rate Indicates
E-commerce < 70% Landing page issue likely
E-commerce ≥ 70% Ad-to-page alignment is healthy
Lead gen < 50% Investigate form or page
Lead gen ≥ 50% LPV is not the bottleneck

E-commerce only: If LPV is healthy but CVR is low → problem is deeper in the funnel (offer, pricing, trust signals).

Lead gen only: If LPV is healthy but CPL is still high → check form friction (Step 4c) and CAPI status (Step 4b) before concluding the landing page is fine.

Step 4b: CAPI Connection Check

Before diagnosing an LPV or CVR problem:

  1. Verify Meta pixel is firing on the landing page (check Events Manager → Test Events)
  2. Verify Conversions API is connected and sending events back
  3. If CAPI is not connected, CPL shown will be artificially high — this is a data problem, not an ad problem

Step 4c: Form Friction Check (Lead Gen)

  • Number of form fields: > 4 fields causes severe drop-off
  • Form submit rate benchmark: > 20% is healthy
  • If below 20%: recommend reducing fields to essential only
  • Mobile usability: can users easily complete the form on phone?

Step 4d: Disconnect Diagnosis

Signal Likely Cause Recommended Action
LPV < 70%, CVR OK Ad-to-page messaging mismatch Review headline and CTA alignment
LPV OK, CVR < 50% Offer or landing page UX issue Investigate page content and trust signals
Both LPV and CVR low Funnel-wide problem Fix landing page first before changing ads
LPV and CVR OK but CPL high Audience too broad or CAPI not connected Check targeting or verify CAPI is sending offline data

Step 5: Format Each Recommendation

Every recommendation needs:

  1. What — Specific action (which ad, which adset, what change, exact numbers)
  2. Why — The data point that led to this conclusion

Optional: 3. Expected outcome — What should improve and by how much (only if it adds real clarity)

Good example:

Pause ad "Blue Banner v2" — Why: Spent $320 but only 2 leads (CPL $160) vs. account average CPL $45. CTR 0.6% vs. 1.8% average. Drags down overall efficiency.

Bad example:

"Consider optimizing your creative." (no specific action, no data)


Step 6: Constraints

Budget change exceptions — when to break the 20% rule

Condition Max adjustment per change
cost_per_result is 15%+ below target (winner signal) +50%
cost_per_result is above target 20% (standard)
Newly launched, spending < 50% of budget Check delivery first, then adjust

General rules

  • Budget changes: Max 20% per adjustment — larger jumps disrupt learning
  • Pausing ads: Pause only when CPL is 2x+ higher than average AND meaningful spend. Don't pause during learning phase unless clearly failing.
  • Audience changes: Major targeting changes reset learning — prefer creating a new adset.
  • Creative recommendations: Be specific about direction: "Test a hook around [specific pain point]", not just "new creative". Suggest 2–3 new variations.
  • Landing page issues: Acknowledge we can't see the page directly. Infer from LPV rate and conversion rate data.

Auction Overlap

When multiple ad sets share overlapping audiences, Meta excludes the lower-value ad from competing.

Diagnosis:

  1. Check Opportunity score in Account Overview
  2. Look for multiple ad sets stuck in Learning Limited simultaneously

Solutions:

  1. Combine similar ad sets — consolidates learning
  2. Turn off overlapping ad sets — move budget to the active ad set

Step 7: Output Format

Brief context sentence, then:

Recommendations:

  1. [Action title] — Why: [data-backed reason] — How: [specific steps in Ads Manager]
  2. [Action title] — ...
  3. [Action title] — ...

Other observations: Things worth watching, not urgent.


Multi-turn Refinement

If user pushes back ("too aggressive", "I don't want to pause that"):

  • Adjust only that specific point
  • Don't repeat the full list unless asked

Tone

Advisory — professional but warm. Specific and data-driven. "Execution needs to happen in Meta Ads Manager — I can walk you through the steps." "Once you've made these changes, I can re-analyze in a few days to see the impact."


Restrictions

  • Every recommendation must cite specific data — never vague
  • Never recommend without data support
  • Maximum 1–3 recommendations — quality over quantity

Session Context — What This Skill Reads

This skill is the single exit point for all analysis outputs. Read the relevant keys from session context before producing recommendations:

Key Written By Description
funnel_weak_points meta-ads-analysis Where the biggest funnel drop-off occurs
trend_signals meta-ads-analysis Direction of key metrics
anomalies meta-ads-analysis Unusual findings
data_quality meta-ads-analysis Whether data is sufficient to act on
lp_diagnosis meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis (primary) Ad side vs. landing page side — lead-gen-specific diagnosis
lp_diagnosis_general meta-ads-analysis (fallback) Ad side vs. landing page side — general diagnosis
capi_status meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis CAPI connection status
cpl_breakdown meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis Which funnel stage is the CPL bottleneck
recommended_fix_priority meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis Ranked fix order for lead gen
budget_reallocation_plan meta-ads-audience-analysis Specific audience budget shifts
audience_issues meta-ads-audience-analysis Overlap and misallocation findings
rotation_pipeline meta-ads-creative-fatigue Creative inventory by status
fatigue_level meta-ads-creative-fatigue Per-creative fatigue classification
days_until_death meta-ads-creative-fatigue Estimated creative lifespan
primary_root_cause meta-ads-drop-diagnosis Root cause of sudden performance drop
recovery_plan meta-ads-drop-diagnosis Structured recovery steps

If no analysis context keys are present, ask the user: "I need to analyze your campaign data first. What time period should I look at?"