360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Wiki Query (Dexio)

面向已有 LLM wiki 的问答流程:用两三种措辞检索并阅读相关页面,基于页面内容作答并给出所依据的页面路径与信任标签;对价格、配置、角色等易变事实回到原始来源核对;明确说明 wiki 未覆盖的部分;把需要多页或外部研究的答案写成含来源与置信度的查询页归档,并顺带修复发现的失效链接。

dexio
热度 7.65
最近更新 2026-09-29 04:36:59
分类:知识依赖:读写文件应用场景:研究 / 笔记整理 / 工作流 / 模板

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add dexio-wiki-query
Metadata
name
dexio-wiki-query
description
Answer a question from an LLM wiki: find and read the relevant pages, answer with the page paths you relied on, check anything mutable at its original source, say plainly what the wiki does not cover, and file substantial answers back as query pages so the research compounds. Use when a person asks something the wiki may cover, or after an answer took real research.
license
MIT
metadata
{"author":"dexio","version":"1.0.0"}

Answer from a wiki

A wiki earns its upkeep when answers come from it faster and better than from scratch, and when good answers are kept so the next question starts further ahead.

Steps

  1. Orient on the question (wiki-orient): search two or three phrasings, read the canonical page and the neighbors that bear on it.
  2. Answer from what you read, and cite it. Give the page paths the answer rests on. If you combine pages, say so. If a page's claim carries a trust label (vendor-sourced, estimate, unverified), carry the label into the answer.
  3. Check mutable facts at their source before presenting them as current: prices, configuration, account state, who holds a role, anything with a date older than the decision it will feed. Say what you checked. If the source disagrees with the wiki, the answer uses the source and the wiki gets fixed (wiki-record or wiki-conflicts).
  4. Say what the wiki does not cover. "The wiki has nothing on X" is a useful answer; a plausible guess presented as if it came from the wiki is a harmful one. If you fill the gap from outside research, mark which parts came from where.
  5. File the answer back when it is substantial. If the answer needed several pages, outside research, or a judgment worth keeping, write it as a query page (below). Trivial lookups are not filed.
  6. Fix what you found on the way. A broken link, a stale date, a missing link between two pages you needed together: fix it with a small edit and a note, or report it.

Query page

Under queries/ (or where the schema puts them), named for the question:

---
title: Which vendors include SSO on their base plan?
description: One line with the short answer, not the question.
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
type: query
tags: [...]
sources: [pages and URLs consulted]
confidence: high | medium | low
---

# Which vendors include SSO on their base plan?

Question (who asked, date).

## Short answer
Two to four sentences.

## Evidence
What was consulted, with links to wiki pages and sources, and the numbers that carry the
answer.

## Confidence and gaps
What would change the answer, and what was not checked.

Link the query page from the pages it draws on when it adds something they lack, so the answer is found from the topic and not only by search. When a follow-up question arrives in the same thread, add it as a section of the same query page rather than a new page.

Pitfalls

  • Answering from memory with the wiki open. If you did not read it in the wiki or a source this session, it is unverified; say so.
  • Citing a page for a claim the page does not make. Quote or paraphrase closely enough that the reader can find the sentence.
  • Filing every answer. A queries/ folder full of one-line lookups buries the real syntheses.