360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

principle-test-behavior-not-implementation

该 Skill 是一份测试编写原则指南,主张测试应断言调用方、终端用户或其他服务可观察的行为,如返回值、错误、可读回状态及外部副作用,而非私有辅助函数、内部调用顺序等实现细节。它给出两条自检:破坏行为时测试应失败,仅重构内部时测试应继续通过,并据此保留、重写或删除测试。

cursor
热度 0.00
最近更新 2026-10-18 16:52:35
分类:开发依赖:纯提示词应用场景:代码生成 / 代码审查

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add cursor/plugins/principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Metadata
name
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
description
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
disable-model-invocation
true

Test Behavior, Not Implementation

A test is a claim about what the code does for its users: a caller, an end user, or another service. Behavior is what those users can observe through the interface they use. That includes return values, errors, state they can read back, and effects on systems outside the code, such as a request sent, a row written, or a message emitted. Implementation is what they cannot observe: private helpers, internal call order, intermediate data, and which internal collaborator did the work.

Judge each test against two imagined edits:

  • Break the behavior. Make the code return a wrong value, skip an effect, or do the effect twice. If the test still passes, it proves nothing. The usual causes are an assertion looser than the contract, an expected value computed by the code under test, a restated constant or prompt string that never runs the code that reads it, and an assertion on data that the test built itself.
  • Change the internals. Keep every observable result the same and restructure the code underneath. If the test now fails, it is pinned to the implementation. It will need a rewrite on every refactor and still catches no bug.

Keep a test that catches the first edit and survives the second. Rewrite or delete the rest. To write a test that does both, drive the code through its users' interface with a concrete input. Derive the expected value from the requirement, not from a run of the code. Assert what the contract promises, no less and no more.

The contract decides, not the shape of the assertion. When "an empty cart never charges" is the promise, an assertion that the payment client got no call is behavior. Pair it with a case where the charge happens, so that the test shows it can see a call. The payload that a mocked external service receives is behavior, because that service observes it. A call to an internal helper is implementation, because no user can see it. An empty list is the exact answer when no record matches, and a hollow check when the test only needs some result. An exact error message pins wording that no caller reads. The error type that callers branch on is the contract.

A test can pin an invariant instead of a call, such as a key that must exist in two tables or a compile-time type check. The invariant is the behavior.