360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

correct

该 Skill 指导代理从提交、回滚、评审意见和说明文件中归纳重复错误,并按架构、类型、lint/CI 检查、测试、文档规则的顺序修复,要求用真实历史错误证明每项检查会失败。它按错误类分别提交,维护规则与执行手段的对照表,也可能删除旧实现、死代码或失效测试。

cursor
热度 0.00
最近更新 2026-10-18 16:52:21
分类:开发依赖:代码执行 / 读写文件应用场景:代码审查 / 调试排错 / DevOps / 代码生成 ...

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add cursor/plugins/correct
Metadata
name
correct
description
Find the mistakes agents keep repeating in this repo and make each one impossible. Try architecture first, then types, then a lint whose error names the fix, then a test, and write docs last. Prove each check fails on a real past mistake. Repeat this each time the operator corrects you. Use for /correct.
disable-model-invocation
true

Correct

The operator keeps correcting agents in this repo for the same mistakes. Change the repo so the next agent can't make them.

Assume every contributor is an agent that sees only the files it opened, copies the nearest example, and takes the shortest path that compiles. Design the repo so a change that looks right from one file is right for the whole repo.

Find the mistake classes

First, read recent commits, reverts, review comments, agent instruction files, and comments that explain workarounds. Group the mistakes into classes. A class counts once it has happened twice.

Fix each class at the highest level that works

  1. Eliminate it with architecture. Give each piece of state one owner and each task one supported way. Hide internals so the wrong import fails. Replace hand-synced lists with one source of truth. Delete old ways and dead code an agent would copy.
  2. Enforce it with types so the bad state can't be written. If bad code still compiles, add a lint or CI check whose error names the file, type, or function to use instead. If the pattern is already common, fail only when a change adds more.
  3. Test the behavior. Fix or delete any test that still passes when the behavior it checks breaks, or that fails when only the internals change.
  4. Write docs or agent rules last, only for judgment calls. Nothing fails when an agent skips them.

Fix and prove

Then fix the most frequent classes now, one commit each. Prove each new check fails on a real past mistake. Run the same command locally and in CI. Exceptions go on the offending line with a reason, an expiry date, and a human's approval.

Keep the rule table

Last, keep a table in the agent instruction file that pairs each rule with what enforces it. When the operator corrects you, fix the mistake and add the rule. If the rule was already there and nothing enforces it, that's a repeat, so fix it at the highest level in the same change. Drop a rule once its mistake can't happen.

Reply: each class with its evidence, the level you picked, and why a higher level didn't work.