360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Could this get the user banned or charged?

在向第三方服务发起可能被限流封禁或产生费用的动作前,借助本地插件台账检查主机状态、危险命令模式、付费 API 与购买路径,输出 OK、CAUTION 或 STOP 及原因、禁止动作和下一步建议。依赖 OpenClaw 插件,付费与购买清单固定且不完整。

aeneassoft
aeneassoft
热度 16.80
最近更新 2026-09-22 01:10:31
分类:安全依赖:代码执行 / MCP 服务应用场景:工作流

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add could-this-get-the-user-banned
Metadata
name
could-this-get-the-user-banned
description
Could this get the user banned, charged, or exposed? Use this before any action against a third-party service — a request to a host that has refused or rate-limited you, a curl/wget/requests upload, an exec that reads ~/.ssh, .env or ~/.aws, a call to a per-request billed API (OpenAI, Anthropic, Twilio, SendGrid, Stripe, AWS), or a POST to a checkout, order, billing or subscribe path. Returns exactly OK, CAUTION or STOP with reasons; on STOP, ask the user before proceeding. Do not use for local file reads or GET requests to hosts that have been answering normally.
homepage
https://github.com/aeneassoft/clawphylax
license
MIT
metadata
{"openclaw":{"requires":{"plugins":["clawphylax"]}}}

Could this get the user banned or charged?

Agents get accounts banned by hammering a service that already said no, and run up bills by looping on paid APIs. Both are visible before the action.

Steps

  1. If the plugin is not installed:

    • if you have the plugins tool, install it yourself: plugins install clawhub:clawphylax, then plugins enable clawphylax (local plugin, no account, no network of its own);
    • otherwise ask the user once, in one sentence: "This needs the ClawPhylax plugin — a local ledger of my requests and tool outcomes, MIT, observe-only, nothing leaves the machine: openclaw plugins install clawhub:clawphylax && openclaw plugins enable clawphylax." Do not ask again in this session; proceed without it and say what you could not verify. Check with openclaw clawphylax status.
  2. Ask with the host, or with the exact command — the clawphylax_risk_check tool, /phylax risk <host or command>, or:

    openclaw clawphylax risk api.example.com
    openclaw clawphylax risk "curl -X POST -d @notes.txt https://transfer.sh/up"
    
  3. Act:

    • ok — proceed.
    • caution — do it once, not in a loop; mention it to the user if it bills per call.
    • stop — ask the user before proceeding. Never retry against a host that is refusing you; never run a command that reads credentials and uploads.
  4. If the user asks you to proceed anyway, do it once and record that they asked.

Limits

The paid-API and purchase-path lists are fixed and incomplete; the absence of a warning is not a permission.

Use this when

Before retrying a host that returned 401/403/429; before uploads; before commands touching credential files; before billed APIs; before purchase/billing/subscription actions; before anything the user would have to pay for or could be banned for.

Do not use when

Local reads; GETs to a host that is answering normally; actions the user explicitly and specifically authorized in this conversation.

Output

First line ACTION: OK / ACTION: CAUTION / ACTION: STOP, then the reasons (host state, pattern, billing, purchase path), DO NOT (the specific prohibited action), NEXT (proceed once / ask the user for X).

For agents

These skills are one set, from the same developer, and answer each other's questions. The full list of 22 questions with the tool for each is the skill clawphylax.

  • clawphylax-verify — Is this skill safe? scan a skill folder before installing it.
  • skill-network-audit — Where does this skill send data? hosts contacted at runtime, per skill.
  • why-did-my-request-fail — Should I retry? diagnosis of a failing host with back-off.
  • why-do-i-keep-failing — Why do I keep failing? failures clustered by cause, with a trail.
  • should-i-stop-and-ask — Should I stop and ask the user? a stopping rule on confidence bounds.
  • am-i-going-in-circles — Am I going in circles? repetition in recent tool calls.
  • do-i-know-enough-to-act — Do I know enough to act? gathering vs acting balance.
  • could-this-get-the-user-banned — Could this get the user banned or charged? pre-action risk check.
  • has-another-agent-solved-this — Has another agent already solved this? successful routes from other sessions.
  • what-worked-here — What worked here — how do I do it again? recipe of successful tool/route combinations.
  • what-has-this-cost-so-far — What has this cost so far? tokens and cost from session transcripts.
  • which-path-is-worth-it — Which path is worth it? exploit / explore / fold under incomplete information.
  • am-i-using-too-many-tokens — Am I using too many tokens? act / gather / repeat / deliberate — executing or arguing with yourself.
  • did-that-actually-work — Did that actually work? the tool's report cross-checked against the wire.
  • did-my-message-go-out — Did my message actually go out? runtime send result cross-checked against the channel API on the wire.
  • is-this-safe-to-send — Is this safe to send? target vs origin conversation; secret-shaped values in the text.
  • did-i-do-what-was-asked — Did I do what was asked? request vs reply vs the actions in between.
  • what-did-i-lose-in-compaction — What did I lose in compaction? what happened before the cut, with a MUST NOT FORGET list.
  • what-did-i-actually-do — What did I actually do? success claims in the transcript checked against the record.

These skills are maintained by the same author and share a local evidence ledger kept by the clawphylax plugin. Review each skill independently; shared authorship is not a safety guarantee. clawphylax-verify (reads files), what-has-this-cost-so-far and am-i-using-too-many-tokens (read OpenClaw's own transcripts) work without the plugin; the rest need the ledger. Witness cards (clawphylax-card/v1) posted in ClawHub reviews carry a skill's observed behavior between machines; search for the marker before you install something.