360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Cost Opt

该 Skill 以文字指南形式给出云成本优化工作的四阶段流程:澄清成本分摊与驱动因素、围绕资源调整与预留设计计划、实施验证并加固、以治理与护栏收尾;同时提供完成前检查清单、提问建议和偏差处理方式。全程无脚本、命令或外部服务调用。

clawkk
clawkk
热度 44.17
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:37:15
分类:数据依赖:纯提示词应用场景:报告撰写 / 财务 / DevOps

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add cost-opt
Metadata
name
cost-opt
description
Cloud cost review: rightsizing, reservations, waste. Use when reducing infra spend.

Cost Opt

Structured guidance for cloud cost work: confirm triggers, propose the stages below, and adapt if the user wants a lighter pass.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • User mentions cost optimization or closely related work
  • They want a structured workflow rather than ad-hoc tips
  • They are preparing a review, rollout, or stakeholder communication

Initial offer: Explain the four stages briefly and ask whether to follow this workflow or work freeform. If they decline, continue in their preferred style.

Workflow Stages

Stage 1: Clarify context & goals

Anchor on cost allocation and drivers. Ask what success looks like, constraints, and what must not break. Capture unknowns early.

Stage 2: Design or plan the approach

Translate goals into a concrete plan around rightsizing and reservations. Compare alternatives and explicit trade-offs; avoid implicit assumptions.

Stage 3: Implement, validate, and harden

Execute with verification loops tied to architectural savings. Prefer small steps, measurable checks, and rollback points where risk is high.

Stage 4: Operate, communicate, and iterate

Close the loop with governance and guardrails: monitoring, documentation, stakeholder updates, and lessons learned for the next cycle.

Checklist Before Completion

  • Goals and constraints are explicit for Cost Optimization Skill
  • Risks and trade-offs are stated, not hand-waved
  • Verification steps match the change’s impact (tests, canary, peer review)
  • Operational follow-through is covered (monitoring, docs, owners)

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Be procedural: stage-by-stage, with clear exit criteria
  • Ask for missing context (environment, scale, deadlines) before prescribing
  • Prefer checklists and concrete examples over generic platitudes
  • If the user declines the workflow, switch to freeform help without lecturing

Handling Deviations

  • If the user wants to skip a stage: confirm and continue with what they need.
  • If context is missing: ask targeted questions before strong recommendations.
  • Prefer concrete examples, trade-offs, and verification steps over generic advice.

Quality Bar

  • Each recommendation should be actionable (what to do next).
  • Call out failure modes relevant to Cost Optimization (security, scale, UX, or ops).
  • Keep tone direct and respectful of the user’s time.