360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

skill 摘要重写 · Skill Summary Rewriter

把已确认的 Storefront Copy Brief 改写为店铺可直接使用的文案,不改变定位。适用于定位明确后,重写标题、简介或首屏文案。输入含受众、触发、承诺、差异化、证据等简报字段;输出 Direct、Distinctive、Compact 三组方案,每组含展示名、frontmatter 描述、主标题、首段、CTA 和最佳位置,并给出推荐、声明核查与废弃措辞。返回纯文本。

bonniegeng-max
bonniegeng-max
热度 43.34
最近更新 2026-09-28 23:52:59
分类:营销依赖:纯提示词应用场景:文案创作 / 品牌素材

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add skill-summary-rewriter
Metadata
name
skill-summary-rewriter
description
Turns an approved Storefront Copy Brief into accurate storefront wording. Invoke when positioning is settled and titles, descriptions, or first-screen copy need rewriting.
version
2.0.3

Skill Storefront Copy

Turn an approved Storefront Copy Brief into storefront-ready copy without changing the underlying positioning. Keep the stable identifier skill-summary-rewriter.

Scope

Use this skill when the audience, trigger, promise, differentiation, and supporting evidence are settled. If a strategy-critical field is unclear, identify the gap instead of masking it with polished wording.

Boundary: current conversation content only / no side effects. Return plain text.

Evidence rules

  • Apply explicit constraints from the current request.
  • Use the approved brief as the strategy source.
  • Support material claims with supplied evidence.
  • Identify conflicts that alter audience, promise, differentiation, or evidence.

Storefront Copy Brief intake contract

  • source_slug
  • current_display_name
  • audience
  • trigger
  • problem
  • desired_outcome
  • alternative
  • why_alternative_falls_short
  • single_promise
  • differentiation_pillars
  • proof
  • must_mention
  • must_not_claim
  • tone
  • placements_and_limits
  • open_questions

Classify intake as:

  • Complete: all strategy-critical fields and sufficient evidence are present.
  • Conservative: only non-critical fields are missing; state assumptions and keep wording narrow.
  • Return to Review: audience, promise, differentiation, or evidence is missing or contradictory.

Preserve source_slug and must_not_claim exactly.

Copy method

  1. Lock strategy-level facts from the approved brief.
  2. Form one outcome-led message spine: [audience] uses it at [trigger] to achieve [outcome], distinguished by [supported differentiator].
  3. Draft three purpose-specific sets:
    • Direct: lowest interpretation cost, suitable for a frontmatter description.
    • Distinctive: emphasizes the strongest supported differentiator, suitable for first-screen copy.
    • Compact: preserves essential meaning under tight limits.
  4. In each set, provide a display name, frontmatter description, hero heading, hero paragraph, optional CTA, and best placement.
  5. Check every material claim against a brief field or supplied evidence.
  6. Recommend one set and placement. Accuracy takes precedence over novelty.

Writing constraints

  • Lead with the supported user outcome, then the method.
  • Name the audience or trigger when space permits.
  • Keep each description focused on one promise rather than a feature list.
  • Remove vague superiority claims and unsupported certainty.
  • The display name may change; source_slug must not.
  • Respect must_mention, must_not_claim, tone, placement, and length constraints.
  • Preserve positioning facts.

Output contract

Intake

  • Brief status: Complete / Conservative / Return to Review
  • Current-request constraints:
  • Brief constraints:
  • Conflicts and resolution:
  • Unspecified fields:
  • Conservative assumptions:

Message spine

  • Audience:
  • Trigger:
  • Outcome:
  • Supported differentiator:
  • Spine:

Direct

  • Display name:
  • Frontmatter description:
  • Hero heading:
  • Hero paragraph:
  • CTA:
  • Best placement:

Distinctive

  • Display name:
  • Frontmatter description:
  • Hero heading:
  • Hero paragraph:
  • CTA:
  • Best placement:

Compact

  • Display name:
  • Frontmatter description:
  • Hero heading:
  • Hero paragraph:
  • CTA:
  • Best placement:

Recommendation

  • Recommended set:
  • Placement:
  • Rationale:
  • Slug, unchanged:

Claim check

For each material claim provide the copy claim, brief field, evidence, and result (Supported / Remove / Confirm).

Rejected wording

For each rejected phrase provide the wording and reason.

同系列 · skill 工程线(Skill Engineering Line)

本 skill 属于「skill 工程方法论」系列 —— 六件工具覆盖一个 skill 从定位到上线的完整链路,按需组合:

  • skill-positioning-audit — 定方向:该卖给谁、差异化够不够
  • skill-summary-rewriter — 写门面:摘要/简介改成能带来安装的版本**(本 skill)**
  • skill-publish-readiness — 上线前:发布自查(结构 / 版本 / 页面 / 安全 / 值不值得发)
  • github-actions-clawhub-doctor — 发不出去:定位 Actions / registry 到底卡在哪一层
  • release-proof-builder — 上线后:证明「现在到底上线没有、能不能装」
  • skill-portfolio-growth-audit — 看全局:整个作品集下一步押注什么

安装任意一个:clawhub install @bonniegeng-max/<slug>