360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

AI-First Engineering

该 Skill 面向大量使用 AI 生成代码的工程团队,提供规划优先、提高评测与回归覆盖、聚焦行为/安全/数据完整性/失败处理/发布风险的代码评审,以及边界、契约和确定性测试的架构建议,并列出 AI-first 工程师招聘信号。

djc00p
djc00p
热度 54.41
最近更新 2026-05-11 17:40:44
分类:开发依赖:纯提示词应用场景:代码生成 / 代码审查 / 工作流

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add ai-first-engineering
Metadata
name
ai-first-engineering
description
Engineering operating model for teams shipping with AI-assisted code generation. Process shifts, architecture requirements, code review and testing standards. Trigger phrases: ai-first engineering, ai-assisted teams, agent code generation, ai team process, shared responsibility review.
metadata
{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🛠️","requires":{"bins":[],"env":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}

AI-First Engineering

Engineering operating model for teams where AI agents generate a large share of implementation output. Adapted from everything-claude-code by @affaan-m (MIT).

Quick Start

  1. Invest in planning quality — ambiguous specs cause AI-generated code to fail; write clear acceptance criteria first
  2. Raise eval coverage — AI code requires higher test standards; regression coverage mandatory for touched domains
  3. Shift review focus — review for behavior, security, data integrity, failure handling; let automation handle style
  4. Design agent-friendly architecture — explicit boundaries, stable contracts, typed interfaces, deterministic tests
  5. Evaluate hiring signals — decomposition skill, measurable criteria definition, prompt quality, risk control discipline

Key Concepts

  • Planning > Speed: Clear specs + good evals trump fast typing. AI can implement fast; humans must specify clearly.
  • Automation is the baseline: Style, formatting, lint issues are solved by automation, not review.
  • Architecture matters more: Implicit conventions break AI systems; use explicit boundaries and typed interfaces.
  • Test coverage is non-negotiable: Generated code needs regression coverage for every touched domain.
  • Shared responsibility: AI generates; human reviews for risk (security, data integrity, rollout safety); human refines when needed.

Common Usage

Code review in AI-first teams — focus on:

Behavior regressions: Did the change break existing functionality?
Security assumptions: Input validation, permission checks, sensitive data handling
Data integrity: Constraints, rollback safety, concurrent access
Failure handling: Network calls, database errors, timeouts, degraded modes
Rollout safety: Feature flags, backward compatibility, canary deploy strategy

Architecture for AI teams:

  • Explicit boundaries between modules (not implicit conventions)
  • Stable contracts (typed interfaces, documented behavior)
  • Deterministic tests (no flaky tests — AI can't debug intermittent failures)
  • Clear error paths (AI struggles with ambiguous error handling)

Testing standard raise:

  • Regression coverage for every touched domain (required, not optional)
  • Explicit edge-case assertions (AI may miss corner cases)
  • Integration checks for interface boundaries (behavior across module lines)

Hiring Signals for AI-First Engineers

Strong signals:

  • Decomposes ambiguous work cleanly → clear, testable units
  • Defines measurable acceptance criteria → no scope creep, clear done condition
  • Produces high-signal prompts and evals → AI generates better code from better specs
  • Enforces risk controls under delivery pressure → doesn't skip security or testing for speed

Weak signals:

  • "Move fast and break things" mindset
  • Writing code without clear specs or acceptance criteria
  • Skipping regression tests to save time
  • Vague PR descriptions ("fixed bugs," "refactored stuff")

References

  • references/process-shifts.md — detailed planning, evals, review guidance
  • references/architecture-guide.md — designing systems for AI code generation
  • references/testing-standards.md — regression coverage, edge-case testing, integration checks