360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Learning with Conceptual Frameworks

用于领域学习、整合多来源或将复制笔记重建为目标导向知识树。先明确问题与成功标准,再确定关键框架/决定性因素,把方法、陷阱、案例按角色归入概念并标注来源与理由,反例可修订框架。输出 learning-framework-<topic>.md,结构为目标→关键框架→概念关系→有来源知识;分支须服务目标,未支持判断标为推断或缺口。不用于普通摘要、结构化提取或软件概念设计。

agenticweb4
agenticweb4
热度 14.01
最近更新 2026-09-29 11:22:15
分类:知识依赖:读写文件应用场景:概念解释 / 研究 / 笔记整理

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add learning-concept-framework
Metadata
name
learning-concept-framework
description
Use when learning a domain, combining sources, or rebuilding copied notes as a goal-directed knowledge tree. Excludes plain summaries, structured extraction, and software concept design.
metadata
{"language":"en","translation_of":"learning-concept-framework-cn","version":"0.2.5","openclaw":{"homepage":"https://github.com/ontology-of-everything/concept-skills/tree/main/skills/en/learning-concept-framework"}}

Learning with Conceptual Frameworks

Purpose: turn a learning goal into a testable key framework so new material can be placed, challenged, and reused in a model tree.

  1. Goal: state the learner's problem and success criterion. If only sources are supplied, infer a provisional goal and label it.
  2. Goal qualification = key framework: ask which decisive factors and relationships achieve the goal. Prefer a fitting familiar/established model. Read supplied sources: support or challenge each factor, explain its contribution, and check completeness, correctness, and limits.
  3. Absorb: place methods, pitfalls, and cases under concepts by their role; cite sources and placement reasons. Counterevidence revises the framework.

Experiment · good: to test fertilizer effects, frame treatment, control, and growth; match light and water, and draw no conclusion without data. Experiment · bad: use planting steps as the trunk and claim an effect without a control or measurements. Sales · good: to explain purchases, treat value, trust, and competition as candidate concepts; place an author's “three key pitfalls” by role. Sales · bad: use those pitfalls as the trunk without explaining purchases.

Write learning-framework-<topic>.md as goal → qualification/key framework → concepts and relations → sourced knowledge. Every branch must contribute to the goal; label unsupported judgments as inferences or gaps. When sources offer verifiable classic positive and negative cases, place them under relevant concepts with outcomes, mechanisms, sources, and limits; otherwise mark cases to find, without inventing them.