360 Secure SkillHub
360 安全技能中心

Vendor Risk Assessment

核心功能:针对AI/SaaS供应商,从安全、数据隐私、合规等6大维度,结合数据敏感度加权计算风险得分,给出通过/附条件通过/否决建议。典型场景包括新供应商准入、年度复审、建买决策、并购尽调及SOC2/ISO等合规需求。输入需按指定格式提供供应商信息,输出结构化Markdown评估报告,含各维度得分、关键发现与整改建议。

1kalin
1kalin
热度 62.56
最近更新 2026-05-17 12:42:41
分类:安全依赖:联网浏览搜索 / 内部调用大模型 / 读写文件应用场景:报告撰写 / 财务 / 研究 / 法律文档

安装技能

复制下面的话术发给你的 Agent,它会通过 secure-skills 检索并安装该技能。

执行命令安装此 skill: npx secure-skills-cli add vendor-risk-assessment
Metadata
name
vendor-risk-assessment
description
Assess third-party vendor risk for AI and SaaS products. Evaluates security posture, data handling, compliance, financial stability, and operational resilience. Use when onboarding new vendors, conducting annual reviews, or building a vendor management program. Generates a scored risk report with mitigation recommendations. Built by AfrexAI.
metadata
{"version":"1.0.0","author":"AfrexAI","tags":["vendor-risk","security","compliance","procurement","enterprise"]}

Vendor Risk Assessment

Evaluate any AI/SaaS vendor across 6 risk dimensions. Outputs a scored report with go/no-go recommendation.

When to Use

  • Onboarding a new SaaS or AI vendor
  • Annual vendor review cycle
  • Evaluating build-vs-buy decisions
  • Due diligence for partnerships or acquisitions
  • Compliance requirements (SOC2, ISO 27001, GDPR)

How to Use

The user provides vendor details (name, product, website, any available documentation). The agent researches and scores the vendor across 6 dimensions.

Input Format

Vendor: [Company Name]
Product: [Product/Service Name]
Website: [URL]
Use Case: [What you'd use it for]
Data Sensitivity: [low/medium/high/critical]
Additional Context: [Any docs, certifications, or concerns]

Assessment Framework

6 Risk Dimensions (each scored 1-10)

1. Security Posture

  • SOC2 Type II certification?
  • Penetration testing cadence
  • Encryption (at rest + in transit)
  • Access controls and authentication
  • Incident response plan
  • Bug bounty program

2. Data Handling & Privacy

  • Data residency and sovereignty
  • Data retention and deletion policies
  • Sub-processor transparency
  • GDPR/CCPA compliance
  • Data portability (can you get your data out?)
  • AI training opt-out policies

3. Compliance & Certifications

  • SOC2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP
  • Industry-specific (PCI-DSS, HITRUST, etc.)
  • AI-specific (EU AI Act readiness, NIST AI RMF)
  • Audit frequency and transparency
  • Regulatory track record

4. Financial Stability

  • Funding stage and runway
  • Revenue indicators (public or estimated)
  • Customer concentration risk
  • Acquisition risk
  • Pricing stability history

5. Operational Resilience

  • Uptime SLA and historical performance
  • Disaster recovery plan
  • Multi-region availability
  • Dependency on single cloud provider
  • Support responsiveness and escalation paths
  • Change management process

6. Contractual Terms

  • Termination and exit clauses
  • Liability caps and indemnification
  • IP ownership clarity
  • Auto-renewal traps
  • Price increase limitations
  • SLA breach remedies

Output Format

# Vendor Risk Assessment: [Vendor Name]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Assessor:** AI Agent (AfrexAI)
**Data Sensitivity Level:** [low/medium/high/critical]

## Overall Risk Score: [X/10] — [LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL]

## Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Risk Level | Key Finding |
|-----------|-------|------------|-------------|
| Security Posture | X/10 | LOW/MED/HIGH | ... |
| Data Handling | X/10 | LOW/MED/HIGH | ... |
| Compliance | X/10 | LOW/MED/HIGH | ... |
| Financial Stability | X/10 | LOW/MED/HIGH | ... |
| Operational Resilience | X/10 | LOW/MED/HIGH | ... |
| Contractual Terms | X/10 | LOW/MED/HIGH | ... |

## Recommendation: [APPROVE / APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS / REJECT]

## Critical Findings
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]

## Mitigation Requirements (if Approve with Conditions)
1. [Requirement 1 — deadline]
2. [Requirement 2 — deadline]

## Research Sources
- [Source 1]
- [Source 2]

Scoring Guide

  • 9-10: Excellent — minimal risk, enterprise-grade
  • 7-8: Good — acceptable for most use cases
  • 5-6: Moderate — proceed with caution, mitigations needed
  • 3-4: Poor — significant concerns, conditional approval only
  • 1-2: Critical — recommend rejection or major remediation

Overall Risk Calculation

  • Average of 6 dimensions, weighted by data sensitivity:
    • Low sensitivity: equal weights
    • Medium: Security 2x, Data 2x
    • High: Security 3x, Data 3x, Compliance 2x
    • Critical: Security 4x, Data 4x, Compliance 3x, Financial 2x

Research Process

  1. Check vendor website for security/compliance pages
  2. Search for SOC2/ISO certifications and trust pages
  3. Check status pages for uptime history
  4. Search for breach history or security incidents
  5. Review pricing page for contract terms indicators
  6. Check Crunchbase/LinkedIn for financial stability signals
  7. Search for customer reviews mentioning reliability/support

Pro Tips

  • Request the vendor's SOC2 Type II report directly — if they hesitate, that's a signal
  • Check their status page history (statuspage.io, etc.) for real uptime data
  • For AI vendors specifically: ask about model training on your data, output ownership, and hallucination liability
  • Compare their security page to competitors — vague = red flag

Need help managing vendor risk across your entire stack? AfrexAI builds autonomous AI agents that monitor vendors continuously — not just at onboarding. Visit afrexai.com or book a call: calendly.com/cbeckford-afrexai/30min